Topic: Sekulow on Russia meeting: 'If this was nefarious, why'd the Secret Service allow these people in?'
Posted by .
Unregistered


I am the only poster in this thread. :afk:


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said: There are two options for what really happened in this situation:

1) Trump's lawyer is lying. The meeting participants were not vetted by the Secret Service.

2) Trump's lawyer is telling the truth. The meeting participants were vetted by the Secret Service.

In order for option 2 to be true, someone in the meeting would have been under Secret Service protection at the time. The only person in Donald Trump's circle under Secret Service protection at the time was Donald Trump. In short, if the meeting participants were vetted by the Secret Service that means Donald Trump attended the meeting.

Notice the exact wording of the Secret Service statement... "Donald Trump Jr. was not under Secret Service protection in June 2016." The Secret Service did not deny vetting the meeting participants or Donald Trump's participation in the meeting.

If the statement made by Trump's lawyer and the statement made by the Secret Service are both true it means Donald Trump was at the meeting.

­ So you're saying that if Donald Trump Sr attended the meeting, the Secret Service would know about it, since they were present.  I gather Robert Meuller and/or the Congressional committees would have asked the SS about it.  It's likely he did not attend.  But extremely likely he was aware of it.


Posted by .
Unregistered


Fagger is still grabbing at at straws. :LOL:


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
­Trump Sr was at the meeting.

­if this is proven then the game is over.


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
. said: There are two options for what really happened in this situation:

1) Trump's lawyer is lying. The meeting participants were not vetted by the Secret Service.

2) Trump's lawyer is telling the truth. The meeting participants were vetted by the Secret Service.

In order for option 2 to be true, someone in the meeting would have been under Secret Service protection at the time. The only person in Donald Trump's circle under Secret Service protection at the time was Donald Trump. In short, if the meeting participants were vetted by the Secret Service that means Donald Trump attended the meeting.

Notice the exact wording of the Secret Service statement... "Donald Trump Jr. was not under Secret Service protection in June 2016." The Secret Service did not deny vetting the meeting participants or Donald Trump's participation in the meeting.

If the statement made by Trump's lawyer and the statement made by the Secret Service are both true it means Donald Trump was at the meeting.

­ So you're saying that if Donald Trump Sr attended the meeting, the Secret Service would know about it, since they were present.  I gather Robert Meuller and/or the Congressional committees would have asked the SS about it.  It's likely he did not attend.  But extremely likely he was aware of it.

­Either Trump Sr's lawyer is telling the truth which means Trump Sr was at the meeting or Trump Sr's lawyer is lying which means he's trying to cover the fact that Trump Sr was at the meeting. Either way Trump Sr was at the meeting.


Posted by .
Unregistered


The secret service just said they weren't at the meeting.


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said: The secret service just said they weren't at the meeting.

­Wrong.

Secret Service said: "Donald Trump Jr. was not under Secret Service protection in June 2016."


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
­if this is proven then the game is over.

Nope you have to still prove other facts......the meeting in itself is not illegal.


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
­Either Trump Sr's lawyer is telling the truth which means Trump Sr was at the meeting or Trump Sr's lawyer is lying which means he's trying to cover the fact that Trump Sr was at the meeting. Either way Trump Sr was at the meeting.

Don't you think that the Secret Service knows if Trump was at the meeting? If he was that would have already come out.


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
Nope you have to still prove other facts......the meeting in itself is not illegal.

A weeks ago the bagger defense was "No contact with Russia." Now it's "Collusion is perfectly legal." :lol:


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
Don't you think that the Secret Service knows if Trump was at the meeting? If he was that would have already come out.

­You're asking my why the Secret Service has not publicly announced classified information?


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
. said: The secret service just said they weren't at the meeting.

­Wrong.

Secret Service said: "Donald Trump Jr. was not under Secret Service protection in June 2016."

­correct, like I said. The secret service wasn't there.


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
. said:
. said: The secret service just said they weren't at the meeting.

­Wrong.

Secret Service said: "Donald Trump Jr. was not under Secret Service protection in June 2016."

­correct, like I said. The secret service wasn't there.

­That's not what the Secret Service said.


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
. said:
. said:
­Wrong.


­correct, like I said. The secret service wasn't there.

­That's not what the Secret Service said.

­link?


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
­link?

­:winner:


Posted by .
Unregistered


What time does the good poster show up? Anybody?


Posted by .
Unregistered


Trump attended the meeting.


Posted by Katalyst
Agent Provocateur


Former US prosecutor on Trump-Russia investigation: ‘People will be going to jail’

‘There may already be people cooperating’ in the investigation

“It’s a really serious investigation, and there are people that are going to go to jail,” Harry Litman, who used to work at the Department of Justice in the 1990s, told The Independent. “The whole atmosphere in the White House has to be paranoid.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-russia-investigation-collusion-crimes-jail-harry-litman-claims-a7840276.html


Posted by .
Unregistered


Katalyst said: Former US prosecutor on Trump-Russia investigation: ‘People will be going to jail’

‘There may already be people cooperating’ in the investigation

“It’s a really serious investigation, and there are people that are going to go to jail,” Harry Litman, who used to work at the Department of Justice in the 1990s, told The Independent. “The whole atmosphere in the White House has to be paranoid.”

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-russia-investigation-collusion-crimes-jail-harry-litman-claims-a7840276.html

No one is going to jail.......Hillary didn't, Loretta Lynch didn't, James Comey didn't, Susan Rice didn't, they all broke the law. So why would someone that didn't break the law go o jail, retard?


Posted by .Katalisp
Unregistered


. said:
No one is going to jail.......Hillary didn't, Loretta Lynch didn't, James Comey didn't, Susan Rice didn't, they all broke the law. So why would someone that didn't break the law go o jail, retard?

­Thuddup bitch. I'm a video game expert.
\
:genyconnor:


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
­
:facepalm:

Treason is against the law, last time I checked. :sadwave:

­

But its not illegal or treasonous if republicans are doing it!
\
:crybaby:

 :lol:


Posted by .
Unregistered


What treasonous act was committed?  What information was provided?

Maybe this has something to do with flying skids of cash to an enemy state.


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said: What treasonous act was committed?  What information was provided?

Maybe this has something to do with flying skids of cash to an enemy state.

­

Why try so hard (and fail) to cover up activity that was lawful?



Quick Reply
Moniker:
 

Registration Required

Thank you for your vote!

But in order to make it count, you must be a registered user.

Log In | Register | Close