Until you observe a position, everything exists in all possible positions. That's why a common refrain is "the moon doesn't exist until you look at it" That is true, the moon is in every possible position until you look at it. Odds are it is just as you'd expect. But, very remote possibility it isn't. The larger something is, the lower probability something weird is going on because in the quantum world, the odds something is in a different position is much greater. But when you have a lot of those things together, the odds are less it is in some weird position because at a quantum level, things are normally in the position "you'd expect" and if they are somewhere else, they are somewhere really close. So, when you get big objects, even if the electrons, etc. are in slightly different places, it doesn't affect the big object because it is still the same. Odds everything moves to the left some large distance is so small, you can toss it out.­

Einstein's equations deal with big objects that's why QM doesn't really affect his shit much. QM deals with tiny objects so that's why it doesn't fucking with Einstein's equations much. They can both be correct but the tie between then that unifies them hasn't been found yet.

I haven't observed you so you might be a girl. Or a tranny or Hunter Biden. Or you might be an AI if that's possible. Until I observe you, you are possibly all those things. Same with me. That's the way it works. It is fucked up but that's reality.

The photon goes through one of the two slits when you observe which slit it goes through. And until you do, it goes through both slits.

By the way, if you want a better argument against relativity, you can look at Godel's rotating universe that allows you to travel back in time. It doesn't disprove Einstein's equations at all and Einstein liked it (they were good friends) but it is fucking cool. Godel was fucking smart but he didn't do that much stuff because he obsessed over the shit he did do so much with some kind of OCD that he was really slow. But when he came up with shit, it was epic.

And one more thing, she is just wrong about information not leaking out of black holes. That partially because this video is from 2020 and the work done on figuring things out was done after that. But she should have known it at the time anyway.

Click. Bait.

Proof

https://www.quantamagazine.org/netta-engelhardt-has-escaped-hawkings-black-hole-paradox-20210823/

Has nothing to do with "Einstein was wrong"

Again, the proper calculations show that the information is not lost. Hawking was a shitty physicist by the way. Should have never gotten Newton's chair, one of the greatest physicists ever. Everyone fawned over him because of his health issues.

gre

I haven't observed you so you might be a girl.

You had better NOT observe me without my permission, you PERVERT!  :stunned:

. said:

­
Eistein's "math" relied on many assumptions that have since been proven to be incorrect.

You don't realize that because you've never actually examined the "math" behind Einstein's theories.

­Actually, Einstein wasn't a math geek.  To get his theories to make sense, he asked for help from math specialists - especially in geometry.

Time is a variable, light is not.

yanno its barbaric even before he, then they hit limits of understanding.  Happy?

bitter voice of the alt-right

. said:

Time is a variable, light is not.

Wrong

Quence said:

. said:

Time is a variable, light is not.

Wrong

­
It's been proven again and again!

Wikipedia loading