...about everything. This short 5 min. video will tell you why.

Einstein's theory was exactly this: a theory. He couldn't be correct or incorrect because it wasn't a definitive thing. He didn't have the technology we have now, neither did he have the advanced knowledge we do now, and no one had ever been in space, no one had ever captured a black hole in images... Einstein had nothing but a chalkboard or a pen and paper to write on. He came up with general relativity in 1915.

Deconstructing Einstein's legacy like that 100 years later is stupid and I'm not surprised a woman is doing it. But all's good because in another 100 years Einstein will still be remembered and no one will remember this dumb cunt.

. said:

Einstein's theory was exactly this: a theory. He couldn't be correct or incorrect because it wasn't a definitive thing. He didn't have the technology we have now, neither did he have the advanced knowledge we do now, and no one had ever been in space, no one had ever captured a black hole in images... Einstein had nothing but a chalkboard or a pen and paper to write on. He came up with general relativity in 1915.

If the math is correct, it doesn’t matter if people have been in space  or if the existence of a black hole is kinda-sorta captured in an image.

Interesting.
It helps explain why Einstein's theories not working on the micro level led to quantum physics and why his theories not working at the macro level made dark energy and other theories came about.

I personally don't believe a single electron or photon goes through a single slit in the slit experiment.
I believe light and other subatomic particles make a wave by simply emitting its energy like a mini Sun and the energy attributes make it through both slits giving the appearance that a single photon went through both slits.
A subatomic particle cannot be in two places at one time no matter what eggheads try to say.

I also think Einstein is correct that gravity can bend space but it is also simply both bending space and causing matter to be attracted to other matter.
Up close up to large gravity well the space is bent but also following the inverse square law it weakens at farther distance while still having attraction to matter without the bending of space itself.

Time doesn't exist. It was invented by humans because of the human fear of eternity and the detachment from God.

that chick definitely does anal

:butthead:

. said:

Deconstructing Einstein's legacy like that 100 years later is stupid and I'm not surprised a woman is doing it. But all's good because in another 100 years Einstein will still be remembered and no one will remember this dumb cunt.

­Smarter than you for sure

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabine_Hossenfelder

Quantum theory isn’t right.

:themoreyouknow:

. said:

...no one had ever captured a black hole in images...

­That is still the case, if you're referring to the recent "picture of a blackhole" bullshit.

There are plenty of "black hole in images" photos.  Just look at any picture of a spiral or elliptical galaxy.

Thanks, Biden

. said:

Interesting.
It helps explain why Einstein's theories not working on the micro level led to quantum physics and why his theories not working at the macro level made dark energy and other theories came about.

I personally don't believe a single electron or photon goes through a single slit in the slit experiment.
I believe light and other subatomic particles make a wave by simply emitting its energy like a mini Sun and the energy attributes make it through both slits giving the appearance that a single photon went through both slits.
A subatomic particle cannot be in two places at one time no matter what eggheads try to say.

I also think Einstein is correct that gravity can bend space but it is also simply both bending space and causing matter to be attracted to other matter.
Up close up to large gravity well the space is bent but also following the inverse square law it weakens at farther distance while still having attraction to matter without the bending of space itself.

­Dark matter and dark energy are as bullshit as the multiverse theory.

Basically physicists' theories are demonstrably WRONG, so they invented magical things that cannot be detected and are therefore impossible to prove exist, and magically then their formulas and theories still work.

They are as much dependent on blind faith as religious tards.

Cliffs: WE LIVE IN A FUCKING COMPUTER SIMULATION.  THE LAWS OF PHYSICS DON'T APPLY PROPERLY, BECAUSE THERE ARE CHEATS BUILT INTO THE CODE, SO THAT IT CAN RUN WITH MINIMUM PROCESSING POWER :rolleyes:
\
Without prejudice

Without prejudice said:

­THE LAWS OF PHYSICS DON'T APPLY PROPERLY, BECAUSE THERE ARE CHEATS BUILT INTO THE CODE, SO THAT IT CAN RUN WITH MINIMUM PROCESSING POWER :rolleyes:
\
Without prejudice

­Like your brain

. said:

­Smarter than you for sure

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabine_Hossenfelder

­
Of course she wrote a book criticizing beauty :lol:

. said:

. said:

­Smarter than you for sure

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabine_Hossenfelder

­
Of course she wrote a book criticizing beauty :lol:

­It's strange how COMMUNISTS all have a similar physical appearance i.e. FUCKING UGLY. :rolleyes:

You can prove this yourself by googling images of:

1.  This KRAUT.
2.  Marion Koopmans, the CUNT who jointly developed the "covid PCR test" with
3.  Christian Drosten
4.  Professor Susan Michie, the multi multi millionaire professor of Behavioural Psychology at UCL, member of SAGE, and Alternative SAGE, and 40 year member of the British Communist Party.  Daughter of the woman who invented IVF.  UBER establishment SLAG who is at the epicentre of the drive towards A Brave New World, of 5G controlled homo borgiensis robotoid SLAVES.

:moreyouknow:

Without prejudice

Epstein did not kill himself.

. said:

Epstein did not kill himself.

­Brian Epstein most certainly killed himself.
The only question is whether he intended to kill himself, or whether it was by way of accident,

Quence said:

 . said:

Einstein's theory was exactly this: a theory. He couldn't be correct or incorrect because it wasn't a definitive thing. He didn't have the technology we have now, neither did he have the advanced knowledge we do now, and no one had ever been in space, no one had ever captured a black hole in images... Einstein had nothing but a chalkboard or a pen and paper to write on. He came up with general relativity in 1915.

If the math is correct, it doesn’t matter if people have been in space  or if the existence of a black hole is kinda-sorta captured in an image.

­
Eistein's "math" relied on many assumptions that have since been proven to be incorrect.

You don't realize that because you've never actually examined the "math" behind Einstein's theories.

You're just a pseudointellectual poser and dilettante.

Without prejudice said:

 . said:

. said:

­Smarter than you for sure

­
Of course she wrote a book criticizing beauty :lol:

­It's strange how COMMUNISTS all have a similar physical appearance i.e. FUCKING UGLY. :rolleyes:

You can prove this yourself by googling images of:

1.  This KRAUT.
2.  Marion Koopmans, the CUNT who jointly developed the "covid PCR test" with
3.  Christian Drosten
4.  Professor Susan Michie, the multi multi millionaire professor of Behavioural Psychology at UCL, member of SAGE, and Alternative SAGE, and 40 year member of the British Communist Party.  Daughter of the woman who invented IVF.  UBER establishment SLAG who is at the epicentre of the drive towards A Brave New World, of 5G controlled homo borgiensis robotoid SLAVES.

:moreyouknow:

Without prejudice

­
TL;DR

:boring:

oh my god FUCK OFF

KILL YOURSELF IMMEDIATELY

FUCK THE BODY

YOU ARE A MAN

NORAH JONES SUCKS NGGR DICKS

TRUST THE SCIENCE, BIGOT!!!!!!!
\
:lib:

Science seems to be debunked every so many years, but the fact that 42% of Americans would vote again for Biden means science doesn’t matter if the individual is fucking retarded

. said:

. said:

­Smarter than you for sure

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sabine_Hossenfelder

­
Of course she wrote a book criticizing beauty :lol:

­
Typical Felder Behavior   :lol:

She is just rehashing stuff they said in the 1930s.
It is an incomplete theory.
Parts of Einstein's theories have been proven correct while opposing theories have not been.
She is correct if not original.
His theories do not work on a quantum level and this has been known for close to a 100 years.

Ok, this is clickbait and she is simply wrong. I know she's a good quantum physicist but that doesn't mean she really understands it completely.

It's sad she is doing so many clickbait videos.

She says a whole bunch of stuff and then says her argument is that Einstein's theory isn't right because it doesn't work with Quantum mechnanics completely. Yeah, we don't have a theory of everything yet. But that doesn't mean it doesn't work with Quantum mechanics, of course. It just means we don't have a theory of everything.

And she doesn't understand that Einstein's equations work absolutely fine with Quantum mechanics if you really, really understand QM. When light/electrons or anything else is defined as the wave equation in QM, it doesn't mean there is an infinite number of "particles". It means that there is a superposition, it is ONE particle in many places. The places it is in are based on probability but that doesn't mean that there is a particle in all those places. The particle's location is define in place when you measure it. When you measure it, you follow your timeline and that defines... what timeline you are following. And the more you know about the position of a particle the less you know about momentum. So, the more you need to know about the effects of gravity on your position, the less you know about some other things. And as you are looking at the work and moving around (measurements), you are following a timeline and everything is matching up.

There's no problem with that and Einstein's equations. It is only if you take a different interpretation, the stupid "we all have the same collapsing wave function, there is only one universal timeline" that it doesn't work. Max Planck and others understood it. She apparently doesn't. She shits on the Many World interpretation in another click bait video when there's nothing to shit on. I think honestly she really just doesn't understand it properly. She can do math for a lot of it but she is missing the big picture understanding that Planck, Everett, etc. had. And she is making a lot of money now from this clickbait shit so she keeps doing it and shitting on everything that isn't done yet. The unification of QM and Einstein's equations is not done. If you want an argument against his equations, the cosmological constant is a better thing to attack. But again, unless you have a basis for it, it is pointless to bring it up.

This video should just say "the complete grand unified theory has not be found yet" and it should tell you why quarks are the way they are, get rid of the cosmological constant, etc. But instead she does this shit. It is just sad.

. said:

I personally don't believe a single electron or photon goes through a single slit in the slit experiment.
I believe light and other subatomic particles make a wave by simply emitting its energy like a mini Sun and the energy attributes make it through both slits giving the appearance that a single photon went through both slits.

­
It isn't just photons and electons that go through one slit, it is everything. When you aren't looking at a friend of yours and there are two doors, they go through both doors. Only when you talk to them about what door they went to or when you observe what door they went through, does the door get determined.

That is what you are missing. Saying a photon or electron doesn't go through a single slit is like saying when you look at your friend going through a door, they go through both doors. It is fucking stupid.

Imagine it this way..

All possible timelines exist. Every word in that sentence is important. "possible" means the physics has to be consistent. You can't have a timeline where you look at your friend and they go through both doors. That would violate the laws of physics. Conservation of mass/momentum/etc. So, you have all these possible timelines. Your friend goes through the left door. Your friend goes through the right door. Your friend dies before he goes through either door. Those are all possible timelines.

An elephant can't appear out of nowhere and fall on your friend unless it doesn't violate the laws of physics. But if it doesn't, then that is also a possibility. When you do QM calculations that determine position when observed, you have to look at all possibilities. Even the remote one. But they happen in terms of their probability. It is very low odds that an elephant will be on a plane, fall out of the sky and on to your friend before he goes through a door. Very remote, although it is there. So, it doesn't really come into play. But there is a possibility so you have to take it into account even though it changes things 1x1o^-1000 or some shit.