Senate passes bill to protect same-sex and interracial marriage in landmark vote
The final vote was 61-36. The bill was supported by all members of the Democratic caucus and 12 Republicans, the same dozen GOP members who backed the bill for a procedural vote earlier this month.


The House will now need to approve the legislation before sending it to President Joe Biden’s desk to be signed into law. The House is expected to pass the bill before the end of the year – possibly as soon as next week.
“For millions of Americans, this legislation will safeguard the rights and protections to which LGBTQI+ and interracial couples and their children are entitled,” Biden said in a statement Tuesday evening after Senate passage, hailing it as a “bipartisan achievement.”

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/senate-passes-bill-to-protect-same-sex-and-interracial-marriage-in-landmark-vote/ar-AA14GbQE

It only took 246 years to allow you to marry outside your race and inside your sex.

Congrats 'Mericants.

Long overdue.  Republicans have been banning it for as long as I can remember.

OUI!

I can finally consummate with my cuban latina with big round ass and plump buoyant tits!

SCOTUS will strike it down and leave it up to the 'States'.

Interracial marriage has been legal all over the US since Loving v Virginia in 1967, and in a lot of states even before that.  Congress is just codifying it to prevent fucktardery by the Supreme Court.

. said:

SCOTUS will strike it down and leave it up to the 'States'.

­They can't strike it down unless they can find something in the Constitution that it conflicts with -- that is, if the Constitution specifically banned gay marriage or interracial marriage.  It doesn't.

The Founding Fathers had dick punishing hott manass with God's blessing FOREMOST in mind when they penned our constitution!
/
:winner:

. said:

The Founding Fathers had dick punishing hott manass with God's blessing FOREMOST in mind when they penned our constitution!
/
:winner:

­That's irrelevant.  Unless the Constitution specifically bans gay marriage, a law recognizing gay marriage is not unconstitutional.  And the Constitution doesn't ban gay marriage -- it doesn't even mention it.

Jennifer Cole-Byrne said:

. said:

The Founding Fathers had dick punishing hott manass with God's blessing FOREMOST in mind when they penned our constitution!
/
:winner:

­That's irrelevant.  Unless the Constitution specifically bans gay marriage, a law recognizing gay marriage is not unconstitutional.  And the Constitution doesn't ban gay marriage -- it doesn't even mention it.

­
That's because queerness and gayness and homosexuality and transgenderism are all socially conditioned / groomed mental illnesses - not accepted by all U.S. citizens and never will be.

. said:

­
That's because queerness and gayness and homosexuality and transgenderism are all socially conditioned / groomed mental illnesses - not accepted by all U.S. citizens and never will be.

­
:lol: 

You need to keep running on that message. It's working great.

Interracial marriage is impossible since there's just one human race.


Different skin pigments means interracial in our inbred island creep language, duh.
\
:Whitetrash:

K.

. said:

That's because queerness and gayness and homosexuality and transgenderism are all socially conditioned / groomed mental illnesses - not accepted by all U.S. citizens and never will be.

­Irrelevant to the question of whether a law protecting gay marriage is constitutional or not.

Die mad about it, baggers.

so not content with having permissive bastards, interracial couples want to birth affirmative action bastards now

marriage is a state issue

EOT

:diversity:

Legal doesn't make it right, all faggots should be killed.

Good. Maybe I should marry the woman I started dating: Salvadorean, black, Indian, and Korean. You can’t imagine. The styling is all over the place.