:facepalm:

That's just embarrassing.

Has the site ever actually been right about anything?

The Gumbi said:

Has the site ever actually been right about anything?

­
I'm over the age of 14 so I don't read it.

You can trust a guy who is guilty of insider trading.

:winner:

Oh jesus the site has a low punctuation, rambling "manifesto" that sounds like it was written by a angst-written teenager. Look at this shit.

though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the united states. used by the likes of mark twain (aka samuel langhorne clemens) to criticize common ignorance, and perhaps most famously by alexander hamilton, james madison and john jay (aka publius) to write the federalist papers, we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the united states, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be. we believe not only that you should be comfortable with anonymous speech in such an environment, but that you should be suspicious of any speech that isn't.

Katalyst said:

Oh jesus the site has a low punctuation, rambling "manifesto" that sounds like it was written by a angst-written teenager. Look at this shit.

though often maligned (typically by those frustrated by an inability to engage in ad hominem attacks) anonymous speech has a long and storied history in the united states. used by the likes of mark twain (aka samuel langhorne clemens) to criticize common ignorance, and perhaps most famously by alexander hamilton, james madison and john jay (aka publius) to write the federalist papers, we think ourselves in good company in using one or another nom de plume. particularly in light of an emerging trend against vocalizing public dissent in the united states, we believe in the critical importance of anonymity and its role in dissident speech. like the economist magazine, we also believe that keeping authorship anonymous moves the focus of discussion to the content of speech and away from the speaker- as it should be. we believe not only that you should be comfortable with anonymous speech in such an environment, but that you should be suspicious of any speech that isn't.

Have a laugh with this:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Zero_Hedge

The Gumbi said:

Have a laugh with this:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Zero_Hedge

:laugh:

Mascara.nli said:

 The Gumbi said:

Have a laugh with this:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Zero_Hedge

:laugh:

"The site posts nearly indecipherable analyses of multiple seemingly unrelated subjects to point towards a consistent theme of economic collapse any day now."

:lol: Sounds very familiar

how can you seriously take CIA establishment connected and corporate owned mass media like ABC, CBS, CNN, NYTimes, WaPo ?

. said:

how can you seriously take CIA establishment connected and corporate owned mass media like ABC, CBS, CNN, NYTimes, WaPo ?

You're right, the CIA controls every news outlet in the USA so it's best to read Zero Hedge despite the fact that they are constantly wrong.

The Gumbi said:

Have a laugh with this:

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Zero_Hedge

­
"It has accurately predicted 200 of the last 2 recessions.[citation NOT needed]"

:lol:

. said:

how can you seriously take CIA establishment connected and corporate owned mass media like ABC, CBS, CNN, NYTimes, WaPo ?

Well, considering that Zero Hedge steals content from those CIA Jews what's the point of reading it?

Accusations of plagiarism

Tyler has a habit of taking other people's research, sometimes adding a slant to it of economic doom if it isn't there already, and posting it on Zero Hedge.[12] This included a series of reports leaked from Merrill Lynch's chief economist David Rosenberg.[13] Lawyers were sent with takedown notices, and were not moved by his claims of censorship about publishing theircopyrighted documents. Morgan Stanley had the same issue later, and is considering legal action in addition to demanding the material be taken down.[14]

Katalyst said:

­
"It has accurately predicted 200 of the last 2 recessions.[citation NOT needed]"

:lol:

:lol: Love that

The Gumbi said:

Katalyst said:

­
"It has accurately predicted 200 of the last 2 recessions.[citation NOT needed]"

:lol:

:lol: Love that

­I was just about to quote that as well.  Fucking priceless!

X

I am the second poster in this thread. :lol:

:oolong:

. said:

I am the second poster in this thread. :lol:

:snicker:

. said:

how can you seriously take CIA establishment connected and corporate owned mass media like ABC, CBS, CNN, NYTimes, WaPo ?

­God damn, there are some debilitatingly stupid people posting here.

. said:

­God damn, there are some debilitatingly stupid people posting here.
\
:cry:

Your tears of defeat are still delicious.

The first rule of Zero Hedge is: You do not talk about Zero Hedge. The second rule of Zero Hedge is: You do not talk about Zero Hedge.

. said:

Your tears of defeat are still delicious.

­^ What a moron. :lol:

Tyler Turden said:

The first rule of Zero Hedge is: You do not talk about Zero Hedge. The second rule of Zero Hedge is: You do not talk about Zero Hedge.

:stfu:

Tyler Durden is a :hen: