Topic: Hillary's new logo
Posted by .
Unregistered


You're going to be seeing a lot of this

http://i.imgur.com/OR8Fj02.jpg


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said: You're going to be seeing a lot of this

http://i.imgur.com/OR8Fj02.jpg

­

Perfect - captures how the economy has performed the past 6 years.


Posted by .
Unregistered


Red means no go.


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
. said: You're going to be seeing a lot of this

http://i.imgur.com/OR8Fj02.jpg

­

Perfect - captures how the economy has performed the past 6 years.

­
The last time the US budget was balanced was during Clinton's presidency :mittens:


Posted by .
Unregistered


If you elect Hillary you get Bill. Its getting two presidents for one vote.


Posted by .
Unregistered


Yeah and neither one is worth a shit.


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said: Yeah and neither one is worth a shit.

­
Yeah unless you like a balanced budget


Posted by .
Unregistered


All somebody has to do is 'reboot' this ad - and Hillary shall topple and fall:



Posted by sean.nli
Unregistered


. said:
­

Perfect - captures how the economy has performed the past 6 years.

­
If that's the case then the arrow should be pointing any other direction but east


Posted by sean.nli
Unregistered


Has anyone ever explained why Hillary continues to wear those Chairman Mao outfits?


Posted by Mascara.nli
Unregistered


sean.nli said: Has anyone ever explained why Hillary continues to wear those Chairman Mao outfits?

­
Those are so bloody unflattering.  I think power women are almost forced to wear crap like that to make them appear stronger.  Elizabeth Warren does that too.


Posted by Mascara.nli
Unregistered


 . said: You're going to be seeing a lot of this

http://i.imgur.com/OR8Fj02.jpg

­
I'm not liking it.  It looks unfinished, and it also suggest that the country will be moving "to the right: or "sideways".

It could be a lot better.


Posted by sean.nli
Unregistered


Mascara.nli said:
­
I'm not liking it.  It looks unfinished, and it also suggest that the country will be moving "to the right: or "sideways".

It could be a lot better.

­
I like Elizabeth Warren.

She wants to shake things up but i'm hoping it's not Saul Alinsky style.

A sprinkling of American Exceptionalism never hurt anyone, unless you need to bomb Iran


Posted by sean.nli
Unregistered


If it's another all three branches it will be another all three X 2 trillion in the hole.

People forget the George Herbert Walker Bush spent money at a faster rate than it could ever be printed


Posted by sean.nli
Unregistered


What we really need is another JFK and a congress not composed of a bunch of reactionary assholes


Posted by .
Unregistered


Baggers' solution to everything is to return to 60 years ago :lol:

Why don't we just do things like we used to?
\
:gramps:

Because the world is a completely different place and virtually nothing works like it did 60 years ago.
\
:shatner:

COMMUNIST!!!
\
:gramps:


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
­
The last time the US budget was balanced was during Clinton's presidency :mittens:

clinton's balanced budget was merely a byproduct of enactment of a change in the way soc sec payments are accounted for. it just happened to leave the gov in the black for that one year, but in the red (plus some) the following year.


Posted by .
Unregistered


sean.nli said:
Mascara.nli said:
­
I'm not liking it.  It looks unfinished, and it also suggest that the country will be moving "to the right: or "sideways".

It could be a lot better.

­
I like Elizabeth Warren.

She wants to shake things up but i'm hoping it's not Saul Alinsky style.

A sprinkling of American Exceptionalism never hurt anyone, unless you need to bomb Iran

­

The phony native american, grabbing AA gimmedats?  Nigga please.


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
. said:
­
The last time the US budget was balanced was during Clinton's presidency :mittens:

clinton's balanced budget was merely a byproduct of enactment of a change in the way soc sec payments are accounted for. it just happened to leave the gov in the black for that one year, but in the red (plus some) the following year.

­
One year? You sure about that?


Posted by .
Unregistered


Is it a mixture of the flags of all the nations who have made large contributions to one of her family foundations?


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
. said:
. said: You're going to be seeing a lot of this

http://i.imgur.com/OR8Fj02.jpg

­

Perfect - captures how the economy has performed the past 6 years.

­
The last time the US budget was balanced was during Clinton's presidency :mittens:

­
Clinton hand forced by Republican Majority.

Obama plays race card instead.


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
. said:
. said:
­

Perfect - captures how the economy has performed the past 6 years.

­
The last time the US budget was balanced was during Clinton's presidency :mittens:

­
Clinton hand forced by Republican Majority.

Obama plays race card instead.

­
Clinton had veto power, aka not forced by Congress as you suggest.


Posted by .
Unregistered


The problem with Hillary is this:  Just yesterday, a leader from yesterday, began a campaign for President by promising to take us back to yesterday. But yesterday is over, and we are never going back. Hillary just a replay of the same old bullshit!


Posted by Katalyst
Agent Provocateur


That logo is shit.


Posted by .
Unregistered


HILLARY WANTS TO GO BACKWARDS!!!
\
:repub:

What would you like to do about healthcare?
\
:nigel:

DEFUND OBAMACARE!!! GO BACK TO HOW THINGS USED TO BE!!!
\
:repub:



Quick Reply
Moniker:
 

Registration Required

Thank you for your vote!

But in order to make it count, you must be a registered user.

Log In | Register | Close