Topic: Now transgendered freaks don't like the asterisk
Posted by .
Unregistered


I shit you not -- this is NOT a Rex. I'll have to break it up into multiple posts because of the 3,000 character limit.

http://www.transstudent.org/issues/asterisk/

Part 1:

. said: Summary: There is nothing inherently problematic with the asterisk but it’s often applied in inaccessible, binarist, and transmisogynist ways. It is unnecessary and should not be used. Claiming the asterisk itself is fundamentally oppressive denies accountability and ignores the culture of binarism and transmisogyny that affects the community. People also often misattribute its history to cisgender and binarist people.

The asterisk originated from search Boolean, where trans* would search for any words starting with trans (transgender, transsexual, etc). The asterisk is useless as a way of attempting to be more inclusive because trans already included all trans people. The asterisk did well for explicitly noting that being trans is not limited to trans men and trans women (as trans without the asterisk was misinterpreted as meaning) but it subtly began working with this misinterpretation and contributed to the incorrect thought that “trans” by itself only means binary trans people. This does not indicate that the term itself is problematic but that it is just not a useful tool. Trans without the asterisk is already inclusive of all trans identities.

{snip}

In the mid-2010’s social justice bloggers (particularly on web sites such as Tumblr) began to claim the asterisk excludes trans women and nonbinary people. The asterisk does not “exclude” trans women and this statement is simply inaccurate. However, we often see it being applied in ways that silence trans women and decenter those struggles as white female assigned at birth trans people who have more access to this sort of language use it to prove how involved in the community they are. The asterisk being used to represent trans (without the asterisk) being exclusionary of nonbinary people comes solely from (mis)interpretation. That was not the intention of the asterisk and is not an inherent factor of its existence, just a common misunderstanding. Similarly, people using “trans* women” instead of “trans women” to subtly delegitimize trans women’s gender identities comes from a misinterpretation of this occurrence. Blaming the silencing of nonbinary people and trans women on the asterisk instead of the groups who silence them and the culture that actually perpetrates these actions denies accountability and ignores the systems of oppression that are really affecting these groups.


Posted by .
Unregistered


Part 2:

. said: While it’s white queer and trans people assigned female at birth who started the asterisk, it’s also white queer and trans people assigned female at birth who are at the front lines of critiquing the use of the asterisk, including the use among trans people of color, trans women, and nonbinary people who use it to describe themselves. The call-out culture prevalent online is something that does solidly contribute to the oppression of some of the most marginalized members of our community by privileging access to the most up-to-date theoretical work around what it means to be trans over actual trans experiences.

In the end, we decided to stop our use of the asterisk because of how unnecessary and inaccessible it is and its common application as a tool of binarism and silencing trans women. We encourage you to do the same. We are in the process of removing all asterisks from our web site, publications, and infographics.


Posted by Teapots.nli
Unregistered


Ra!  Since I transitioned, this has been bugging the shit out of me.


Posted by .
Unregistered


https://www.redstate.com/alexparker/2019/08/13/reaching-pinnacle-stupid-students-petition-change-white-pedestrian-crossing-lights-shade-closer-people-color/
Pining For The Pinnacle Of Stupid: Students Petition To Change White Pedestrian Crossing Lights To A Shade Closer To People Of Color


We’ve all been there: You’re about to cross the street, when suddenly you spot a sign with a stick figure, and you’re paralyzed by oppression. 



“As we students cross the street, we are told by the symbol of a white man when it is okay to cross. Many students from diverse backgrounds, including individuals of color, gender fluid individuals, and LGBTQA+ individuals, feel oppressed by this. … [We] vehemently urge the University to consider changing the crosswalk signs.”


Posted by .
Unregistered


If a fucking white stick figure sends you into a thumb sucking frenzy you have bigger problems than being unable to figure out what gender you are.


Posted by .
Unregistered


The asterisk itself is fundamentally oppressive ­
\
:libduet:­

Fucking Snowflakes


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said: You’re about to cross the street, when suddenly you spot a sign with a stick figure, and you’re paralyzed by oppression. 

The white man tells you when to GO.

Shouldn't it be more offensive that a RED figure tells you when to STOP?


Posted by .
Unregistered


I'd let a feminine tranny blow me. A mouth is a mouth.



Quick Reply
Moniker:
 

Registration Required

Thank you for your vote!

But in order to make it count, you must be a registered user.

Log In | Register | Close