Topic: The story of Bill Richardson and George Mitchell being pedos sure didn't have much of a shelf life
Posted by .
Unregistered


It was mentioned in passing if at all. No followup, no reporters camped out at their homes looking for comment. Hasn't been mentioned once by the mainstream media since it was leaked on Friday.

They are democrats of course.


Posted by .
Unregistered


They denied it.  It's a he-said, she-said with no evidence either way.  Without new developments, what do you want the press to keep reporting on?


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said: They denied it.  It's a he-said, she-said with no evidence either way.  Without new developments, what do you want the press to keep reporting on?

­
The same women who made claims against Epstein made them about Richardson and Mitchell. Why would they be credible claims about Epstein but ignored for the others as he said she said?


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
­
The same women who made claims against Epstein made them about Richardson and Mitchell. Why would they be credible claims about Epstein but ignored for the others as he said she said?

­
Because there's years of known history on Epstein, not to mention his conviction for whoring with underage girls.  There's no he-said in his case, he wasn't even claiming innocence.

There was only one woman who made claims about Richardson and Mitchell.  She made claims about several others, like Prince Andrew.  The media is treating them all as unverified claims, which they are.


Posted by .
Unregistered


You shouldn't be glad.  Trumptard Alan Dershowitz got fingered too.  No one's following up on that either


Posted by poundMeToo
Unregistered


. said: They denied it.  It's a he-said, she-said with no evidence either way.  Without new developments, what do you want the press to keep reporting on?

­
:press:

WE BELIEVE WOMEN


Posted by .
Unregistered


poundMeToo said:
­
:press:

WE BELIEVE WOMEN

­
The media at best advocates for listening to women, not automatically believing them - which they shouldn't.


Posted by .barr
Unregistered


we're gonna find out.


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said: Trumptard Alan Dershowitz got fingered too.

Fingered, maybe, but he is adamant that no penile penetration took place.


Posted by .
Unregistered


We knew where that was going and put a stop to it.
\
:hillary:


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said: You shouldn't be glad.  Trumptard Alan Dershowitz got fingered too.  No one's following up on that either

­
:nono:
You got that backwards.
Some underage girls got fingered.


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
­
The media at best advocates for listening to women, not automatically believing them - which they shouldn't.

­
Yes, that was proven conclusively during the Kavanaugh hearing


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said: You shouldn't be glad.  Trumptard Alan Dershowitz got fingered too.  No one's following up on that either

­
He should be jailed for raping kids.


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
­
He should be jailed for raping kids.

­
All you have is one woman's assertion that he did, which he denied.  Sure you want to send him to jail just based on one woman's word?


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
­
All you have is one woman's assertion that he did, which he denied.  Sure you want to send him to jail just based on one woman's word?

One mentally unhinged woman nearly kept Kavanaugh off the bench. We need a full congressional investigation. Just to be sure.


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said: They denied it.  It's a he-said, she-said with no evidence either way.  Without new developments, what do you want the press to keep reporting on?

­
You mean the documents that the FBI has from Epstein, along with all the travel information, which implicates both of those democrat politicos is not evidence?

:rofl:


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
­
You mean the documents that the FBI has from Epstein, along with all the travel information, which implicates both of those democrat politicos is not evidence?

If the FBI has those documents, they've likely been destroyed by the FBI by now. :tinfoilhat:


Posted by .
Unregistered


. said:
. said: They denied it.  It's a he-said, she-said with no evidence either way.  Without new developments, what do you want the press to keep reporting on?

­
You mean the documents that the FBI has from Epstein, along with all the travel information, which implicates both of those democrat politicos is not evidence?

:rofl:

­
Link to those documents?  We'll wait.



Quick Reply
Moniker:
 

Registration Required

Thank you for your vote!

But in order to make it count, you must be a registered user.

Log In | Register | Close