As I get older and older, I fear being the 40+ unsuccesful guy
. Unregistered
Posted 7/29/2012 9:52 pm
Again, why let some cunts control you WITHOUT giving you sex in return? It was bad enough when some cunt controlled you and gave you sex for it.
Posted 7/29/2012 9:57 pm
Tables turn once you get older. Women tired of floppy fat couch blokes. All you have to do is stay fit and reasonable semblance of groovy, they will be all over you.
The problem is that your sex-drive will not be the same. You have become more interested in things that intrigue you, but that's not what the women will be interested in.
They will continue to be interested in the most mundane things. Things that have little or no meaning to you at all.
Posted 7/29/2012 10:35 pm
This is true. I would be embarrassed to tell you what I did for pussy in my twenties. In my fourties? Meh. Hit it when I can and it's not too much hassle.
I deserve it I guess, just mother nature doing her thing. I hate being a semi sexual relevant man, but it is much better than being a sexually irrelevant woman. Again, men never expected somebody to marry them and work until they were 70 to support them. Being an old fart working at home depot to pay the mortgage or rent or whatever sucks ass, but doing the same as an old hen is just hell.
Posted 7/29/2012 11:05 pm : Edited 7/29/2012 11:06 pm
I'm 43 and make $145k as a doctor in san francisco. I have $1 mil in the bank and live in a 300 squae foot apartment. I don't own a car. I weigh 230 pounds and am 5 foot 8. I'm balding but wear a hat all the time.
Yet for some reason I find it impossible to attract hot 25 to 35 year olds.
What am I doing wrong???
It's poor. An average home in any major metro area will run you $675 large, minimum. 2 cars, $30K each Average, $60K. Schools, you will be living in a 'good schools' zone, so expect taxes to be about $16-20K year. Oh, and they will STILL not be really good enough for little Jeremy and Brie, so you'll have to send them to fucking private school anyway, K-12. That will run you $50K year, each kid, each year.
Do the math, schleprock. If you intend to live in a decent, middle-class life, insulated from etc, you are not even close to being close at $80,000 after tax.
Posted 7/29/2012 11:10 pm
Who cares? You see the bait not the hook. How would you like to have no apartment, $500,000 in the bank and $4,000 in monthly alimony payments?
Spend $20k annually on high quality hookers once a week and you will thank me later.
Only reason to get married is to have kids and half the time they will be taken away from you.
Strange game professor Falken, the only way to win is not to play.
$160K gross income places you in the top 5% of incomes in the United States. So you're basically (and mathematically impossibly) saying that at least 95% of the people are poor.
etc, you are not even close to being close at $80,000 after tax.
I felt like that at 40!!!
