. said:

. said:

Yup. Because completely writing off entire chunks of the population is sooo presidential.

Well killing them off would be preferred to writing them off yes.

. said:

. said:

. said:

Yup. Because completely writing off entire chunks of the population is sooo presidential.

Well killing them off would be preferred to writing them off yes.

Even the little babies?

. said:

Well killing them off would be preferred to writing them off yes.

. said:

Well, unfortunately you can't. So, you know, cry like a little girl.

. said:

12-13% of the entire population. 3 out of every 25 Americans are black. And you're going to just say "Ah, we don't need them."

Good luck with that.

. said:

. said:

In all seriousness, it's a horrible PR development for Romney.

Look, I know this board is chock full of racists, but you can't just pretend the black vote doesn't exist. No matter how much you try and disenfranchise it.

And even if you STILL don't like black people, Romney is running for president. If he can't connect with 13% of the population, that's a major problem no matter how you look at it.

And then there's the whole issue of reflexivity. Meaning, it's not even that 12-13% are to be written off, but the appearance that you can't even manage the respect of this group rubs off negatively on the rest of the population. The message being "This guy can't lead."

The black vote doesn't matter. It's in the bag for Obama and nobody else gives a shit about the NAACP.

. said:

Why can't I?

. said:

LOOK AT THE MATH.
\


BLACKS DON'T MATTER.
\

. said:

Well, unfortunately you can't. So, you know, cry like a little girl.
\

. said:

12-13% of the entire population. 3 out of every 25 Americans are black. And you're going to just say "Ah, we don't need them."

Good luck with that.

. said:

Blacks only matter in a few key states. VA, OHIO, FLA. Romney can win without them, but he has run such a mediocre campaign to this point, that it is unlikely to happen.

He's going to win without Ohio?

. said:

. said:

Blacks only matter in a few key states. VA, OHIO, FLA. Romney can win without them, but he has run such a mediocre campaign to this point, that it is unlikely to happen.

He's going to win without Ohio?

Excuse me, I meant he's going to win without Ohio and Florida?

. said:

Yup. Because completely writing off entire chunks of the population is sooo presidential.

. said:

If you want a president who will make things better in the African-American community,
you are looking at him, Romney said. You take a look.


Romney to NAACP: Im better for black community than Obama
http://news.yahoo.com/romney-naacp-m-better-black-community-obama-161703201.html

. said: