F2 Navigation   |  Options  |  Login  |  Register  |  Status  |  FAQ  |  Upload Pics  |  Work-Safe Bookmark and Share


Back to Index | Reply to Topic

Page: 1 2 3  | Previous  Next | First  Last

  U.S. Navy Going Green, Spending Extra 622% to Use Chicken Fat Fuel
.
Unregistered

MW.nli said:Once we figure out how to power them up, hydrogen cells will take over.

:facepalm:

Moron, what word in "nothing replaces oil" proved too difficult for you to grasp?

Most hydrogen sourced today comes from fossil sources, primarily natural gas. NG is a petroleum by-product. NG is also depleting. ALL fossil fuels are depleting. That's why they are FOSSIL fuels.

You could cover the ocean in solar cells that crack water into H2 and O2, but it will never approach the pure economy of petroleum. Ever.

Petroleum was like magic. You got about 25000 man-hours of labor-equivalent energy in every barrel. Today, you can get one of those barrels of massive amounts of energy for a lousy $100. But that's barely within the range of what the American economy can afford to run on. We simply waste too much energy to get things done. We're fat and wasteful, but the alternative is to have nothing like today's economy, which is to say, pretty much NO economy.
Mr_Right
169% Right

18378 posts

MW.nli said:
Mr_Right said:
MW.nli said:http://www.schatzlab.org/projects/hydrogen.html



If problems were so easy to solve just by posting links, the world would be an easy place.



Yes, you actually have to follow and read them.



No thanks; I would rather wait till it hits the market and is available and convenient to use as gasoline.
Meanwhile, drill, drill, drill.
MW.nli
Unregistered

. said: :facepalm:

Moron, what word in "nothing replaces oil" proved too difficult for you to grasp?

Most hydrogen sourced today comes from fossil sources, primarily natural gas. NG is a petroleum by-product. NG is also depleting. ALL fossil fuels are depleting. That's why they are FOSSIL fuels.

You could cover the ocean in solar cells that crack water into H2 and O2, but it will never approach the pure economy of petroleum. Ever.

Petroleum was like magic. You got about 25000 man-hours of labor-equivalent energy in every barrel. Today, you can get one of those barrels of massive amounts of energy for a lousy $100. But that's barely within the range of what the American economy can afford to run on. We simply waste too much energy to get things done. We're fat and wasteful, but the alternative is to have nothing like today's economy, which is to say, pretty much NO economy.



If everyone thought like you we'd still be using oxcarts.
.
Unregistered

People who know what they're talking about (which means NOT MW.nli), try to correct public "thinking" on hydrogen by calling it an energy CARRIER, not a fuel. The economies of hydrogen make it impossible to use as a fuel, since we don't actually EXPLOIT it. We don't mine it, or drill for it, or anything like that. Hydrogen must be PROCESSED into usable form, and that kills its economy.
MW.nli
Unregistered

Mr_Right said:No thanks; I would rather wait till it hits the market and is available and convenient to use as gasoline.
Meanwhile, drill, drill, drill.



I would rather we save that limited resource for another time and use what is even more plentiful and accessible instead.
MW.nli
Unregistered

. said:People who know what they're talking about (which means NOT MW.nli), try to correct public "thinking" on hydrogen by calling it an energy CARRIER, not a fuel. The economies of hydrogen make it impossible to use as a fuel, since we don't actually EXPLOIT it. We don't mine it, or drill for it, or anything like that. Hydrogen must be PROCESSED into usable form, and that kills its economy.



You didn't bother to read the first part of my post that you're dissing.
Mr_Right
169% Right

18378 posts

MW.nli said:
Mr_Right said:No thanks; I would rather wait till it hits the market and is available and convenient to use as gasoline.
Meanwhile, drill, drill, drill.



I would rather we save that limited resource for another time and use what is even more plentiful and accessible instead.



Stupid logic. "I rather starve now and eat 50 years later".
It's only limited if you limit yourself. There is plenty of oil and natural gas to last us forever,or until another technology is refined and ready.
Stop thinking like that. There is plenty of natural gas right now to keep going for a long time, and whether you admit it or not, 'fossil fuels' keep on getting regenerated with time.
MW.nli
Unregistered

Mr_Right said:Stupid logic. "I rather starve now and eat 50 years later".
It's only limited if you limit yourself. There is plenty of oil and natural gas to last us forever,or until another technology is refined and ready.
Stop thinking like that. There is plenty of natural gas right now to keep going for a long time, and whether you admit it or not, 'fossil fuels' keep on getting regenerated with time.



Looking at the price of that "Unlimited Resource" one might think otherwise. Don't know about you, but I'm tired of having my nuts squeezed by Big Oil.
.
Unregistered

MW.nli said:If everyone thought like you we'd still be using oxcarts.

Nothing you say will overcome the truth of what's going to happen to the U.S. economy. You're going to run out of oil. Then natural gas, then coal. Then you'll have nothing. Even running out of oil will give you nothing, since unemployment will rise above 50%. Commerce in the USA in 2080 will drop to 10% of what it was in 2020. By 2100, it will be at 5%.

Oil made everything move. Nothing replaces oil. The outcome is obvious, but you can't admit it, since you can't admit your comfortable life is coming to an end. You can't admit your oil-fueled civilization is ending.
Mr_Right
169% Right

18378 posts

MW.nli said:
Mr_Right said:Stupid logic. "I rather starve now and eat 50 years later".
It's only limited if you limit yourself. There is plenty of oil and natural gas to last us forever,or until another technology is refined and ready.
Stop thinking like that. There is plenty of natural gas right now to keep going for a long time, and whether you admit it or not, 'fossil fuels' keep on getting regenerated with time.



Looking at the price of that "Unlimited Resource" one might think otherwise. Don't know about you, but I'm tired of having my nuts squeezed by Big Oil.



Do you apply logic to real life situations?

The price is high because they are limiting the unlimited resource artificially. Three magic words for you:

Drill, Drill, Drill.
MW.nli
Unregistered

. said:Nothing you say will overcome the truth of what's going to happen to the U.S. economy. You're going to run out of oil. Then natural gas, then coal. Then you'll have nothing. Even running out of oil will give you nothing, since unemployment will rise above 50%. Commerce in the USA in 2080 will drop to 10% of what it was in 2020. By 2100, it will be at 5%.

Oil made everything move. Nothing replaces oil. The outcome is obvious, but you can't admit it, since you can't admit your comfortable life is coming to an end. You can't admit your oil-fueled civilization is ending.



You and Mr. Right should talk.

The rest of your post is propaganda bullshit. You don't know the future any more than I do.
.
Unregistered

. said:$26 a gallon gas? Bush was worse!
\
:lib2:




The effort to develop the use of biofuels for the military started with a task force set up by then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld in 2006, under President George W. Bush.


It's a pilot project that won't be deployed until 2020, and that's only if they get the costs down.

Don't let the facts get in your way, Cletus :lol:

:pwned: :mittens:
.
Unregistered

MW.nli said:You didn't bother to read the first part of my post that you're dissing.

Hydrogen isn't a fuel. Period. It can't save you, therefore, when you try to replace a F-U-E-L like petroleum.

You're scared. You know your civilization has no future, energy-wise, and that scares you. So you indulge in fantasies like "hydrogen". But it's still just a fantasy. Nothing CAN replace what oil did for us. Oil is the intersection of three critical factors, and all must be present in an alternative, BUT nothing matches those three factors. Most alternatives aren't even close.
MW.nli
Unregistered

Mr_Right said:Do you apply logic to real life situations?

The price is high because they are limiting the unlimited resource artificially. Three magic words for you:

Drill, Drill, Drill.



Very short-sighted view. Beaver hats were cool, too.
TheRealMW
Registered

60 posts

MW.nli said:Very short-sighted view. Beaver hats were cool, too.


Fuck off, Willow.
Mr_Right
169% Right

18378 posts

Too much negativity in this thread. THE SKY IS FALLING NONSENSE.
MW.nli
Unregistered

. said:Hydrogen isn't a fuel. Period. It can't save you, therefore, when you try to replace a F-U-E-L like petroleum.

You're scared. You know your civilization has no future, energy-wise, and that scares you. So you indulge in fantasies like "hydrogen". But it's still just a fantasy. Nothing CAN replace what oil did for us. Oil is the intersection of three critical factors, and all must be present in an alternative, BUT nothing matches those three factors. Most alternatives aren't even close.



*yawn* Oil could run out tomorrow and it would probably be a good thing in the long run. Doesn't scare me a bit, but you're projected your fear quite well.
TheRealMW
Registered

60 posts

MW.nli said:*yawn* Oil could run out tomorrow and it would probably be a good thing in the long run. Doesn't scare me a bit, but you're projected your fear quite well.


Fuck off, Willow.
.
Unregistered

MW.nli said:You and Mr. Right should talk.

The rest of your post is propaganda bullshit. You don't know the future any more than I do.

You're scared and you don't know what to do. After all, you can't accept the literal END of your energy-gulping civilization.

It's physics, guy. It's geology and chemistry. These facts aren't debatable since there's no debate. They're true. We're depleting oil, and nothing replaces oil, for being inexpensive, dense and easy fuel source. Take even ONE of those factors away, and you have a nearly UNUSABLE fuel source. If it's expensive, then you can't have tens of millions of commuters on it, neither can you run a just-in-time national supply system. If it's not an energy dense fuel, you may as well not even use it. Not enough "oomph". And if it's not easy to use, then the economy breaks down with it anyway.

The family automobile will be obsolete by the end of this century, since there will be no affordable fuels for it. That will kill your economy deader than your sanity.
.
Unregistered

. said:Uh, no. Oil's ROI was huge and remained huge for a long, long time. When you barely stick a pipe in the ground and the stuff just comes gushing out... you should get the idea.

Alternate energy sources will never compete. None of them have the three critical factors that oil provides: Inexpensive, dense, easily used energy. That's why oil fuels nearly everything that moves in the West.

You could try to making a liquid fuel from other sources, but the cost explodes.

You can't get around it: Nothing replaces oil. Americans won't admit it. Americans can't afford to admit it, since they'd have to admit their energy-gulping civilization is OVER.



I meant when oil was first discovered it was considered pricy to extract since the technology wasnt in place then to make it easily recovered. The same is true for alternative energy technologies today until they mature.
MW.nli
Unregistered

. said:You're scared and you don't know what to do. After all, you can't accept the literal END of your energy-gulping civilization.

It's physics, guy. It's geology and chemistry. These facts aren't debatable since there's no debate. They're true. We're depleting oil, and nothing replaces oil, for being inexpensive, dense and easy fuel source. Take even ONE of those factors away, and you have a nearly UNUSABLE fuel source. If it's expensive, then you can't have tens of millions of commuters on it, neither can you run a just-in-time national supply system. If it's not an energy dense fuel, you may as well not even use it. Not enough "oomph". And if it's not easy to use, then the economy breaks down with it anyway.

The family automobile will be obsolete by the end of this century, since there will be no affordable fuels for it. That will kill your economy deader than your sanity.



Fine by me. Scares the shit out of you, though.
.
Unregistered

MW.nli said:*yawn* Oil could run out tomorrow and it would probably be a good thing in the long run. Doesn't scare me a bit, but you're projected your fear quite well.

Doesn't scare you? So you're not scared that millions would be stranded, without food and medicine?

Nobody believes your lies. You're even lying to yourself.
.
Unregistered

MW.nli said:Fine by me. Scares the shit out of you, though.

You can't grow your own food. You're reliant on income from the overall economy. You're not prepared for the end of your economy. Stop lying.
MW.nli
Unregistered

. said:Doesn't scare you? So you're not scared that millions would be stranded, without food and medicine?

Nobody believes your lies. You're even lying to yourself.
\
:afk:



Nice projection. Are you sweating profusely?
MW.nli
Unregistered

http://www.schatzlab.org/projects/hydrogen/h2stn.html

Page: 1 2 3  | Previous  Next | First  Last

Back to Index | Reply to Topic

 
Quick Reply
Moniker:
Message: