Mr_Right said:

Prenups are pretty much useless and over time lose their power. They are pointless.

. said:

Mr_Right said:

Prenups are pretty much useless and over time lose their power. They are pointless.

Link?

A lot of f2ers make that claim, but I've never seen any evidence of a solid prenup being overturned in the US.

. said:

Mr_Right said:

Prenups are pretty much useless and over time lose their power. They are pointless.

Link?

A lot of f2ers make that claim, but I've never seen any evidence of a solid prenup being overturned in the US.

Exactly. It's their justification for never being able to have a real relationship.

Do never marry. Hoes before bros. Keep makin' dat green. Westside!
\

Mr_Right said:

Prenups are pretty much useless and over time lose their power. They are pointless.

. said:

Do. Never. Marry.

What is so hard for guys to understand about this?

Getting a prenup = playing Russian roulette with four chambers loaded instead of five.

. said:

The judge in a divorce always has the power to break to prenup if it is not -- in his or her opinion reasonable.

. said:

. said:

Do. Never. Marry.

What is so hard for guys to understand about this?

Getting a prenup = playing Russian roulette with four chambers loaded instead of five.

80% of prenups get overturned in the US?

Is that really your claim?

Yet, you can't even provide a single case of a solid prenup being overturned in the US? Not one?

Mr_Right said:

You can google it and find plenty of cases.

. said:

. said:

Do. Never. Marry.

What is so hard for guys to understand about this?

Getting a prenup = playing Russian roulette with four chambers loaded instead of five.

80% of prenups get overturned in the US?

Is that really your claim?

Yet, you can't even provide a single case of a solid prenup being overturned in the US? Not one?

It's a metaphor. Marrying a with no prenup is like taking a good chance of blowing your brains out, just to (you THINK) get laid a few times. Getting a prenup improves your odds, but you are still taking a good chance of blowing your brains out, just to (you THINK) get laid a few times.

. said:

It's a metaphor. Marrying a with no prenup is like taking a good chance of blowing your brains out, just to (you THINK) get laid a few times. Getting a prenup improves your odds, but you are still taking a good chance of blowing your brains out, just to (you THINK) get laid a few times.

part time lawyer said:

Child support is entirely separate so if you don't take that into account in the prenup and specify exactly what's going to happen your prenup will be effectively worth diddly shit when your child support payments are included.

. said:

I'm not talking about UK.

I'm not talking about weak prenups, like how Steven Spielberg's prenup was written on a napkin, and was overturned.

I'm not talking about prenups that are given to the bride just days before the wedding.

I'm talking about solid prenups, done before the wedding invitations have gone out, both sides have lawyers, and the poorer party would get something.

Are there any cases where a solid prenup was overturned in the US? Link?

Mr_Right said:

Tell me lawyer, I am tempted of putting Esq. after my name when I send out letters.
Is that legal?

part time lawyer said:

Child support is entirely separate so if you don't take that into account in the prenup and specify exactly what's going to happen your prenup will be effectively worth diddly shit when your child support payments are included.

part time lawyer said:

Mr_Right said:

Tell me lawyer, I am tempted of putting Esq. after my name when I send out letters.
Is that legal?

It's pretty much legal. It can depend on the content of the letter though and how you're representing yourself.

. said:

A solid prenup seems to improve the odds DRAMATICALLY, since you prenup critics can't even find ONE single case where a solid prenup was overturned in the US.