the pagan world was filled with dread and fear. The masses had to toil for the elite few. Christianity elevated the dignity of the working man and woman.
The original Christianity did. But modern Christianity despises the working man and woman, if they're not Christian. They follow the Old Testament far more than Christ's teachings.
Sorry. I thought it was obvious. I think it was to the rest of us.
The part that you added about your gods throwing stuff together just to piss each other off.
You hadn't said that before, so you weren't saying it again.
Re-read the chain of quotes. You'll see it.
I did reread the chain of quotes. If you had, you wouldn't have gotten all butthurt about the "not necessarily" point, since the quote you responded to BEGAN with it.
\
Cool down, there, angryboi. I didn't get butthurt about anything you posted.
I was reminding you of what you posted, and what you didn't.
You said "again" and then posted for the first time something about gods creating things to piss each other off.
That was the first time you said it. You weren't saying it again.
I don't know what you might mean by that, but it's great to get your opinion.
Forces of nature were seen as personal attributes of various Gods, around which were woven a complex cultural labyrinth of tales and myths; many were converted into poetry, songs and art - and formed a colourful, dynamic center of everyday life and rituals.
We can't even imagine this.
I think we can, but I think we've also overcome that sort of backwardness.
And I think that modern White culture is the most complex and awe-inspiring culture that ever existed.
I don't understand why you nice people use "rich" to mean impoverished when talking about primitive cultures.
the pagan world was filled with dread and fear. The masses had to toil for the elite few. Christianity elevated the dignity of the working man and woman.
Which society or civilization are you referring to? can you name any non-christian civilizations that are NOT like this?
It's not as though NASA is underfunded because dollars are being diverted to the Protestant church.
The tax exemption subsidizes the Protestant church to the tune of billions. So yes, it's quite possible NASA is underfunded because of the Protestant church, and thousands of other churches.
the pagan world was filled with dread and fear. The masses had to toil for the elite few. Christianity elevated the dignity of the working man and woman.
It didn't really. It acknowledged the ordinary folk, and introduced the notion of egalitarianism, but didn't change the reality of hierarchy.
It was anti-materialistic, and gave comfort and validation to those without, but the rewards were located in Heaven.
Its benefit was mainly abstract and internal, and served very poorly by the cross icon.
It's not as though NASA is underfunded because dollars are being diverted to the Protestant church.
The tax exemption subsidizes the Protestant church to the tune of billions. So yes, it's quite possible NASA is underfunded because of the Protestant church, and thousands of other churches.
Why are churches tax exempt again?
I personally feel they should be taxed, perhaps at a reduced rate than businesses, which means they will hardly pay anything at all
Cool down, there, angryboi. I didn't get butthurt about anything you posted.
I was reminding you of what you posted, and what you didn't.
You said "again" and then posted for the first time something about gods creating things to piss each other off.
That was the first time you said it. You weren't saying it again.
Re-read the thread if you'd like.
And calm down.
Why does someone politely asking about your beliefs get you so defensive?
I wasn't defensive, and you weren't polite.
It's okay if you're angry and rude, but it's not okay to say, "not necessarily, maybe ... ", then say something for the first time, and then become disagreeable with the person who points out that you were then suggesting something new, something you hadn't before.
It's okay if you're angry and rude, but it's not okay to say, "not necessarily, maybe ... ", then say something for the first time, and then become disagreeable with the person who points out that you were then suggesting something new, something you hadn't before.
So just because you keep squirming and rewriting history, here's the exchange that got you all bent out of shape:
You mean three collaborators?
Not necessarily. They could be three gods of creation who all hate each other.
I didn't ask you whether or not they liked each other.
I asked if you think of them as collaborating on the creation of everything.
Again, not necessarily. Maybe the universe is the result of a bunch of crap each one created, just to piss off the others.
Notice how you've avoided confronting any of the possibilities raised, and only whined about someone saying "Again, not necessarily" when the very post you replied to started, "Not necessarily"?
Why not address the speculation instead of whining?
Posted 6/17/2012 12:16 pm
People used to pray to the Sun God and the Rain God and all manner of other Gods but science and rationality has put paid to that. The christian/muslim/jewish God will be following suit soon enough.
Society must have been a lot more interesting, certainly culturally richer, pre-Christianity, when the pantheon of Greco-Roman gods formed the daily background of worship and belief. Aesthetically pleasing and narratively interesting, they beat a tortured man on a cross any day, in terms of explanation, inspiration and personal identification.
I can only presume the reason the crucified Christ became so prevalent as an icon was as a warning that "this is what happens to those who buck the system", ie. promulgated by Christianty's enemies.
Give me Artemis and her nine breasts any day.
I was reading the Norse creation myths, and actually thought "This is a lot deeper than Genesis. "
And because, people have a natural tendency to like thinking of themselves as victimized - "crucified" for their beliefs.
When you're an oppressed victim, you're the paragon of virtue, and not responsible for anything. You get to whine endlessly, then demand special privileges.
The principle applies to everything from black culture, to feminists, to Christians. It's organized self-pity. Modern Christianity is 1 part humility and service to others (the things Jesus prosetylized), to 100 parts whining and demanding special privileges (the things political lobbies thrive on).
I was just reading a review of a book called something like "magical thinking". Their thesis, backed up with a lot of experimental evidence, was that the more horrible the event, the more likely religious people would blame it on God, or God's will.
Society must have been a lot more interesting, certainly culturally richer, pre-Christianity, when the pantheon of Greco-Roman gods formed the daily background of worship and belief. Aesthetically pleasing and narratively interesting, they beat a tortured man on a cross any day, in terms of explanation, inspiration and personal identification.
I can only presume the reason the crucified Christ became so prevalent as an icon was as a warning that "this is what happens to those who buck the system", ie. promulgated by Christianty's enemies.
Give me Artemis and her nine breasts any day.
One of the reasons Romans started to like the Christians is the way they faced persecutions and death. The many martyrs going stoically to their deaths fit the Roamn ideal of bravery. Made it attractive.