Shiny New Kid
Revolution is the only solution14312 posts
Posted 8/22/2011 2:52 am
Thank God the Americans chose not to get involved or we'd still be in this war in 2025
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
.
Unregistered
.
Unregistered
.
Unregistered
Posted 8/22/2011 2:58 am
Shiny New Kid said: Thank God the Americans chose not to get involved or we'd still be in this war in 2025
Drunk already? Your trolling is subpar today.
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
.
Unregistered
Posted 8/22/2011 3:03 am
. said: The CIA is all over the place there.
So is SAS. They are being held captive by the Libyan rebels
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
Shiny New Kid
Revolution is the only solution14312 posts
Posted 8/22/2011 3:07 am
. said: Why is Britain still in Afghanistan?
Because the Americans are running things there.
Turn it over to the Brits and it'll be over in a month.
Of course, that wouldn't suit Halliburton at all
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
.
Unregistered
Posted 8/22/2011 3:10 am
Shiny New Kid said: Because the Americans are running things
there.
Turn it over to the Brits and it'll be over in a month.
Of course, that wouldn't suit Halliburton at all
Britain already lost Afghanistan many years ago.
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
.
Unregistered
Posted 8/22/2011 3:11 am
. said: Britain already lost Afghanistan many years ago.
SNK faggot owned
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
.
Unregistered
Posted 8/22/2011 3:11 am
. said: Shiny New Kid said: Because the Americans are running things
there.
Turn it over to the Brits and it'll be over in a month.
Of course, that wouldn't suit Halliburton at all
Britain already lost Afghanistan many years ago.
If I remember correctly the retreat wasn't very pretty.
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
Shiny New Kid
Revolution is the only solution14312 posts
Posted 8/22/2011 3:16 am
. said: . said: Shiny New Kid said: Because the Americans are running things
there.
Turn it over to the Brits and it'll be over in a month.
Of course, that wouldn't suit Halliburton at all
Britain already lost Afghanistan many years ago.
If I remember correctly the retreat wasn't very pretty.
And then Britain went back and won.
"The Second Anglo-Afghan War was fought between the United Kingdom and Afghanistan from 1878 to 1880, when the nation was ruled by Sher Ali Khan of the Barakzai dynasty, the son of former Emir Dost Mohammad Khan. This was the second time British India invaded Afghanistan. The war ended in a manner after attaining all the British geopolitical objectives. Most of the British and Indian soldiers withdrew from Afghanistan. The Afghans were permitted to maintain internal sovereignty but they had to cede control of their nation's foreign relations to the British.[3][4]"
That's the way to control Afghanistan, not troops on the ground and trying to impose your own form of government on a bunch of tribes
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
.
Unregistered
Posted 8/22/2011 3:20 am
Remember when the UK requested help from the US in Libya?
brits are fucking worthless.
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
.
Unregistered
Posted 8/22/2011 3:21 am
. said: Britain already lost Afghanistan many years ago.
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
.
Unregistered
.
Unregistered
Posted 8/22/2011 3:22 am
Shiny New Kid said: Thank God the Americans chose not to get involved or we'd still be in this war in 2025
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
mr the teapots
Registered14193 posts
Posted 8/22/2011 3:23 am
. said: I thought the French led the Libyan invasion
They are, with canada number 2. Britain is mainly providing reconnaissance and sammiches for the fighting men.
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
.
Unregistered
Posted 8/22/2011 3:27 am
mr the teapots said: They are, with canada number 2. Britain is mainly providing reconnaissance and sammiches for the fighting men.
Cobs.
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
.
Unregistered
Posted 8/22/2011 3:36 am
. said: I thought the French led the Libyan invasion
The French and Uk both begged the US for help.
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
.
Unregistered
Posted 8/22/2011 3:38 am
. said: The French and Uk both begged the US for help.
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
.
Unregistered
Posted 8/22/2011 3:39 am
. said:
You can't possibly be this stupid.
Oh wait, you're a limey. Yeah, you can be this stupid.
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
.
Unregistered
Posted 8/22/2011 3:41 am
. said: Shiny New Kid said: Thank God the Americans chose not to get involved or we'd still be in this war in 2025
Drunk already? Your trolling is subpar today.
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
.
Unregistered
Posted 8/22/2011 3:51 am
. said: You can't possibly be this stupid.
Oh wait, you're a limey. Yeah, you can be this stupid.
Yes, because all Brits are stupid, aren't they. Never achieved anything in life, those Brits.
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
.
Unregistered
Posted 8/22/2011 4:00 am
. said: . said: You can't possibly be this stupid.
Oh wait, you're a limey. Yeah, you can be this stupid.
Yes, because all Brits are stupid, aren't they. Never achieved anything in life, those Brits.
SNK certainly hasn't, marooned in Thailand, pretending to be more royalist than the Queen.
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
.
Unregistered
Posted 8/22/2011 4:02 am
. said: SNK certainly hasn't, marooned in Thailand, pretending to be more royalist than the Queen.
I used to know some South African Jews like that.
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
.
Unregistered
Posted 8/22/2011 4:04 am
. said: Yes, because all Brits are stupid, aren't they. Never achieved anything in life, those Brits.
You forgot the question mark, stupid.
Quote Single Quote Nested Link
.
Unregistered