Posted 1/9/2012 11:35 pm
What could have happen to Lara Logan to give her assault/rape a complete cover-up.Let's start with one naked woman with 200 horny men,they were already groping and inside her,raping her with many hands.Many wanted to fuck the large breasted blonde woman and was already fucking her with their hands (in both holes) I wonder what their next assault apond her was,being given 1 to 3 hours where no one could stop them or find her? MULTIPLE RAPE WITH BREAST GROPING.
Wow! look at some of the comments. I especially like this one:
"Tell Laura Logan to get her facts straight when doing a story. To screw up the type of ship the Sullivan brothers were killed serving on is either laziness or profoundly disrespectful to them and the men who died with them. Especially mouthing errant information in the intro to a story...that speaks to fundamental work ethic and credibility."
We are not in court. I didn't say i had proof. I said i am convinced. I have seen and heard enough that taken altogether i know what happened. Suort of a tape or pictures what would be propf.
Posted 1/10/2012 2:33 am
This thread is to obsess over Lara Logan assault/rape attack/gangrape penis/no penis and until we get the details to this puzzle by way of the truth,it will be "Play it again Sam" and again,and again with the same information/details,until Lara or Egypt reveal what most of us diehearts have been waiting for.We will keep rearranging this puzzle until all the pieces fit.
Question? Muslims blew up the Navy ship it was terrorism,All the road side bombs in Iraq was terrorism, Anything that harms, hurts, or kills Americans is Terrorism! Lara's Attack was by Muslims in a horrific manner and it's just Sexual Assault. Not one mention of any Action taken by this Administration to bring to Justice ANYONE for this CRIME!
WHY?
The "mistake" is easily explained. The Sullivan brothers did duty on a Cruiser NOT a battleship that is true. But...the problem is that in most recent decades the battleship has vanished to be replaced by the cruiser as the largest surface combat ship. In WW II that was different. Now very few civilians know the exact difference between dreadnought battleship, battle-cruiser, armored cruiser, cruiser and the like.
What is the difference between saying Battleship instead of Cruiser? A Cruiser sounds strange. For a military expert it is immediately clear what a cruiser is and what a cruiser is capable of. But for the average non military a cruiser is a word devoid of any meaning.
So...being a journalist doing a report where you kinda use the info for the intro what do you do? Every Picture and word counts. So...you say to yourself: Battleship sounds like BATTLE. It has also more dramatic undertone. As a kind of category for ALL warships you could use it. The civilian will get the idea. Only the naval experts would probably be confused and criticize the decision.
Plus: The information how the Sullivans died was also very abridged. The Sullivan brothers were really only the intro to the persons now serving the USA in Afghanistan. It was not meant to be a report on the Sullivans.
PS: She is LARA NOT LAURA. The guy who was so angered by the mistake with the warshipclass and then he did a similar mistake. So much for pedantry.
Posted 1/10/2012 11:23 am
Those soldiers in Afghanistan must have been excited to learn that she was coming. I'm sure they know who she is and what happened to her in Egypt. They must have heard that she surrendered to the sexual assault. All those long days of deployment without a single female. I wonder what happened after the interview.
