RealEuropeanElitist said:

That sums it up nicely. Exactly how i feel too to be honest. Does it entice me with rage knowing that her attackers will never be punished that there will never be a serious well executed investigation? Does it hurt me to know that in this case many principles of journalism and journalistic ethics were blatantly broken and that concerning the case of a journalist who adhered to these principles and ethics and believed in these very strongly even in the face of adversity from her own network/from the public? Yes it does.

But does it feel good to give her a hard time because of this? No. Does it even make sense in demanding the truth when almost everybody out there only wants to start whacking off when something more is said about the whole thing? Not really. Is there anything now in the revealing department that could seriously support and help her? No... Is it even wrong to wish for her and CBS to let that one go away? Nope...it does not...it clashes only with the above written paragraph of mine...and that is the problem...the question is: What do you do if the journalist becomes the news? And we have not found an answer to that. And when the Journalist is beautiful and was raped the answer seems to become more difficult and taboo.

We are not ready for something like this. But God help us: In future we will have more of these cases with other journalists. 100%.

. said:

CAIRO: The body of Essam Ali Atta Ali, who was reportedly sodomized to death by police inside the Tora maximum security prison, was taken from the Zeinhom Morgue to Tahrir Square late Friday...

http://www.thedailynewsegypt.com/human-a-civil-rights/thousands-of-angry-protesters-mourn-latest-torture-victim.html

. said:

why don't you fucking drop dead already?
find a shrink for you asperger's problem

. said:

. said:

http://pinkvisualhdgalleries.com/galleries/episode/7849/jpg/7849_39.jpg

. said:

Wow, this thread really had some legs.

. said:

. said:

thats the other point I made earlier, we have yet to hear of anyone get gangraped in public, so far from what we've seen, people who are attacked in public are stripped and beaten, the actual rapes we know of tend to take place in private secluded areas. don't you think if they were raping her, she would not have been dragged along into the laps of those women. if they were gangraping her, they would still have been raping her when the soldiers showed up. I understand your point, but previous attacks tell us different. I am sorry to disappoint everyone who is hoping that she got severly gangbanged, but, it did not happen.

there are numerous tales of women being raped in public during the protests. someone posted links way back showing one woman activist had her shirt torn open and her nose bloodied and she was being carried by an army tank to an ally to be beaten or who knows what and another guy said he'd seen at least fifteen women gang raped in the street from his view in his apartment building. women were getting raped left and right all week long.

the reel superjerk said:

Sorry but this is bullshit. Way more needs to be revealed. Like who did this and why has no one bothered to bring anyone to justice? I find it hard to believe they can't id some of the people responsible especially since the guys standing behind her in the famous photo likely had something to do with it. I also want it revealed why not one witness has come forward out of the hundreds. I want to know why such a huge fascinating story went for months without a shred of independent reporting. I want to know what Hilary's diplomats found. I want to know why she was sent back there after being deported. I want to know if they raped her in the biblical sense because despite all your neo feminist banter it does fucking matter.

She has got a husband to support her and a legion of fans on her facebook to write about what a hero she is. This board is not for that and it never was. I support your right to say and write what you will but please knock off the "there is nothing to see here" crap. If you believed that you wouldn't have 500 posts to your name.

. said:

. said:

Wow, this thread really had some legs.

. said:

Did anyone download any of the torrents like this one before they got taken down? If so, why haven't you come forward and said something?

http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/6193237/Lara_Logan_Assault_Mobile_Phone

. said:

remember, 40-45 minutes is the length of time from the start of the attack until her rescue, her seperation was about 25 minutes. this is backed up by others. thats not enough time for a gangbang, also, we have yet to hear of someone that was gangraped in public, there has been stripping and groping, but gangrapes have generally taken place in private secure area's. those who refuse to believe Logan are most like sexual perverts and excessive masterbators. personally, I hope she she got a good hard mega gangrape, I think reading the details of it would be so HOT! but if we use our brains, we would relize that what she told us, is roughly what happened.

. said:

thats the thing, with all those people involved in some way shape or form, don't you find it odd that nobody in almost nine months nobody has contradicted her story. a missing 40 minute to 1 hour time slot, where the fuck does that come from. how do you know there is a missing time slot. there are dozens if not hundreds of people on this thread still searching the net for new info. and nothing. unless you know someone that was there, or a member of the crew, or Logans psychiatrist/doctor or a CBS exec. you probably don't know more than the rest of us. so quit dreaming.

. said:

look at the rue89 article. it backs up the time frame. and she had no incentive to cover anything up. she is in French media, beyond the reach of the supposed strong arm of government and CBS. second, that article painted Logan in a very negative light, that journalist was not a fan of Logan, if there was more there, she would have gladly said so. what an insult it would be to Logan that we would need everyone from the crew to formally state that she was not actually raped. as if her testimony was suspect and needs back up. should there be a second journalist there everytime she does a 60 minutes peice to say, yes she is reporting the story correctly. Logan spoke for everyone in that interview. she said she told it like it was. end of story.

. said:

perhpas there is a cover up? but not like you think, think about it. since the attack, she had recieved letter from people, many distingushed people at that, recieved all kinds of awards. it would be very difficult now, if the truth of what led up to the attack implicates her very strongly for being responsible for her own attack. how did she behave the hour in the crowd before the attack? how did she speak to the men? what were the exact threats by the police a week earlier? it's like if I wound up in a wheelchair from a car accident, there is a great outpouring of sympathy, then later people find out I was three times the legal limit in alcohal consumption, (of course, that would be public record and I could not hide, but for sake of theory, say I could), the level of sympathy would significantly drop if people found out I was drunk, I would want to hide that. I believe the same is true of the attack, if we really new everything that led up the attack, it would be obvious that she is to blame for getting herself raped. this is why they want to cover a lot of details up, not so much of during the attack, but what led up to the attack. thay want this to go away. now more so, since she is revcieving all kinds of awards and distinctions. you conspiracy people are warm, but not hot. in fact, the more we talk about and analyze what happened during the attack, totally plays into their hands, becuase it draws attention away from the real cover up.