Raped by several men with penis,one after the other after the other sustained and rotated from vaginal to anal to oral raping.This is after a estimated 50 to 100 pair of hands are groping,pinching,finger fucking and handraping her to no end.
Yes but the question before the courts is not whether the picture is degrading it is whether or not it is newsworthy? The is issue is not right to privacy because the rape occurred in a public place with now expectation of privacy. The issue is right to publicity. The point of contention here seems to be that if you can reasonably argue that the publishing of a picture had news value than the right to publicity is also trumped. It's hard to argue this wouldn't have news value. God knows what the court would rule. My point is that is not so cut and dry.
I won't argue that it is morally and ethically wrong to publish the pictures. I am arguing that it is not legally wrong.
And REE, thanks for talking to me again. I don't mean to piss you off. But you do get up on high horse sometimes and I love to be the devils advocate. Cheers, SJ
I still think it is also legally wrong but not without seriously using legal action. Either way we would probably need an legal expert who specializes into copyright issues and the like. In college i had a seminar where it was discussed briefly but that is no expertise on my part i could really bring forward.
HEY. I NEVER stopped talking to you. It was just about the TONE of your postings sometimes. I never had so much problems with the CONTENT. The tone you used now in your post? You could have told me EVERYTHING and i would have listened to you and tried to talk with you. Of course you CAN be the devils advocate, please be it. There is nothing wrong with it.
But i acknowledge that you may see it differently. Maybe language is not so taboo-ized for you. You cite Pulp Fiction often. Okay. I think i can try to understand you. I will try to take that into account when next writing an answer to you.
And that...i mean with TONE...no it wasn´t me that wrote the reprimand above. But it nailed it perfectly: You can say EVERYTHING but why do you have to say it in such a vulgar and hurting way? In THIS context it seems to me overly cruel to be honest. No-one deserves this. And to my knowledge Lara Logan NEVER raped anyone, tortured anyone, killed anyone or shuffled someone off to a concentration camp to be slowly killed there. So why doesn´t she get the benefit of politeness and restraint in language?
How should you know? Maybe the REAL RAPE VICTIM is just a troll.
But to be honest it could be that here ONE REAL rape victim accuses another ONE REAL rape victim of not being a real rape victim. I don´t know how you feel about it but that´s just terribly sad and makes me feel shitty just thinking about it.
I think that what was meant there was that the previous speaker was saying that the original poster sounded like it was a *he*, and not at all a *rape victim.* I also agree that it *could have been* the same idiot as posts all the other toxic venomous posts, that clearly reflect his simple hate for LL. I also wonder if this is the same guy who once wrote here as "das_but." Because, the "two of them" really do sound similar. So, just like someone is getting on the LL's case, as well as on my case (remember "cornpassionBreak?" -- someone else seems to catch the "dush-butt" by its tail. I applaud this as a good idea, and from now on, will vigorously support the cause.