1.Wait... you mean the Congress guy? I thought we were through with him...
2.As far as ein Berliner is concerned, I thought that this actually means some kind of pretzel. So Clinton got himself laughed at, when he made that statement. I read that in a magazine.
OK. So it won't be allowed in the mainstream web and will not be allowed underground (because it is somehow 'not legal'). Why are we wasting our time with this thread? By the way, I don't think an underground ban will succeed.
A tremendous and widespread push was made all over the web after the CBS announcement and it all appears to have been fake and deliberately so. There is a valid case for the hoax option (if the bruise revealed during that speech is considered insufficient by itself). But the idea of this being a hoax is so incredible given the potential damage to the credibility of both Logan and CBS that it boggles the mind to contemplate it. There is no rational reason for them to do anything that stupid given the fallout if they got caught.
I don't know how they would have explained the absence of their star reporter over an extended interval of time if the hadn't put out the press release.
No one could expect her to just blurt out the gang aspect of the assault. She had already established being physically restrained by a surrounding mob and "surrendering" to the assault. Additionally, she made what appeared to be an attempt at a joke during the start of her acceptance speech on August 11th for that award she received. The language she used for a key part of the joke was very strange given the formality of the dinner setting. It seemed out of place at an event that she knew would be recorded. It could be interpreted as revealing a little more detail about her circumstances that night. I don't know. I do know that she is not likely to sit down and cheerfully discuss exactly what happened to her.
Posted 9/9/2011 12:24 am
The fat kid video was out days after the report by CBS that she was attacked so I dont see how his could use the stories such as Rue89 and other reports because his came first. Part one and two came later in Feburary but we count those as being fake but they both have similar tales and similar story lines and it was also stated by some one earlier about 100 pages or so back that the fat kid was real similar to what CBS reported except a little far fetched. Being that his was out days after the first report of this makes you wonder if he did see something on the web.
Posted 9/9/2011 12:30 am
The real telling thing is that there is not even any pictures of her in the crowd by people during the hour they filmed and made their way around other then what CBS showed in the 60 minute interview. I find that the lack of proof either way is weird in itself but also makes it a point that something very bad happened and no one wants to discuss it or show it and I don't think that CBS would have said anything had they not been forced too. Makes me wonder what AP knows of this and why they have been quiet
She starts at about 42 minutes into the event, I think, after the WWII reporter. Listen to what she says and how and contrast it with the lady from Al-Jazeera (who follows her, I believe). I'm not going to put any ideas in your head. Does anything seem out of place?
The fake web pages and YouTube comments and emails between the people posting the comments (whose contents are unknown) where operational from the day, probably from the hour, that CBS made the announcement. Several days permits plenty of time for the various posers to collaborate on several lurid versions of the story. The Fat Kid admits to having email contact with others prior to posting his video.
I don't think that he saw anything. He mentioned that his IP address was being monitored by the authorities. That means they found nothing on his computer -- it would have been seized if they had found something. It seems that they believed his fake narrative also. But what he says makes no sense because no U.S. charges had been filed on this so why would the authorities threaten him?
All of this cooperation between media professionals starts to sound like conspiracy. There is no way that everyone who knows anything is going to keep quiet. No way.
Posted 9/9/2011 1:09 am
Unemployment is high in Egypt, especially for women. What they should do is open up strip clubs and have sex tours to attract more tourist. Sell the Lara Logan dvd, and have tours around where the attack took place.
Posted 9/9/2011 1:34 am
CBS knows the entire horrible story from the being of the stripping to the flying out the next day straight to the RAPE specialist.The producer,camera man,even the useless bodyguards all know and was not interview by any outside source,and not allow to give any statements to the public.Since this small group of men was suppose to work and protect her,being missing for any amount of time,once united with her,and seeing her looking and being such a mess (as said by her producer) they knew she was attacked badly.They knew how it started,and she filled them in on the where/how and possibly she reveal what they did to her in the missing time span.They also had access to witness/eyewitnesses there that night,more willing to talk to them.CBS insiders all know the truth of what happen that night.All the details and visual too.
