F2 Navigation   |  Options  |  Login  |  Register  |  Status  |  FAQ  |  Upload Pics  |  Work-Safe Bookmark and Share


Posts by floor_pisser

Page: Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 Next

 Timestamp Post 
12/30/2011 1:51 am

View Thread

View Post
Winkypop said:Sorry, I didn't realize you were only 11.



yes, i was eleven.

see how stupid that is? feel ashamed of yourself. right now.
12/30/2011 1:46 am

View Thread

View Post
Winkypop said:Dodge?
Fuck me, you DO mix in poor debating circles.



do they allow buffoonish sputtering in your debating circles? because that's all i've seen from you. that and typical atheist dodges and word games.
12/30/2011 1:41 am

View Thread

View Post
Winkypop said:Yes I was.



i said are. present tense.

typical atheist dodge
12/30/2011 1:37 am

View Thread

View Post
winkypop said:So no over time for god then.
He needs a better union.

You, hatchling fish!
Go forth and be fishy!!

:lol:



you are a child.
12/30/2011 1:28 am

View Thread

View Post
winkypop said:He must be one fucking busy cunt.

Insects!
Go forth and be insectile!

Bacterium!
Go forth and be bacteriumish......


:lmao:



time doesn't affect god. there is no "busy," you vulgar husk.
12/30/2011 1:25 am

View Thread

View Post
winkypop said:

Who then 'teaches' a dog to be a canine?



god.
12/30/2011 1:06 am

View Thread

View Post
winkypop said:

Being 'atheist' is actually the default setting for humans.



so is being hungry and pooping all over yourself. we are taught to be human. by god.
12/30/2011 1:02 am

View Thread

View Post
i do. if you don't believe in god, you are less than human imo. i consider atheists to be their own distinct "man" -- a sub-race of scheming, troll-like imposters. not part of the soul's family.
12/23/2011 8:53 pm

View Thread

View Post
. said:I read about a guy who got a handler and spoke to the locals(handler translated). The talk wasn't completely open but not totally on the party line. He saw poor areas and got some feel for the place. He wanted to go back.



if you remember the name, please let me know. as an aside, i've only seen one documentary in which someone (a south korean journalist iirc) managed to sneak a hidden camera into the dprk and interview some of the locals.
12/23/2011 7:54 pm

View Thread

View Post
mr the horse said:That the North Koreans "insane, wacky, inexplicable" interest in military power might possibly have something to do with the presence of the military forces of an aggressive foreign power on their border?

:shrug:



shit i'm dumb i started reading the thread over again while waiting for you to reply and found the "1950s war" quote in teapots op. must've skimmed over it the first time my bad
12/23/2011 7:47 pm

View Thread

View Post
mr the horse said:They're not fighting a "1950s war", they're fighting a current war. Or I suppose the US troops in South Korea are an illusion?



wtf are you talking about?
12/23/2011 7:10 pm

View Thread

View Post
. said:

It's what US doesn't want NK to have and that is nukes.



they already have them.
12/23/2011 7:01 pm

View Thread

View Post
. said:Anyone else want to go on a tour of NK ? It sounds so different than anywhere else.



no. you're not allowed to do / see anything on your own. you're escorted at all times by a handler, and only permitted to visit government-approved tourist sites. no interaction with the locals is possible. the rest of the time you're confined to your hotel (they set the itinerary, not you). and then it's time to go home. big whoop. every two-bit discovery channel hack has their own north korea travel documentary these days.
12/23/2011 5:49 pm

View Thread

View Post
easy solution: move to the other side of the puget sound, and commute to seattle by ferry. :thumbup: the most expensive monthly pass is still way cheaper than the bridge, plus would you rather be chilling on a boat or stuck in traffic?
12/23/2011 4:12 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:The Maria song.

She climbs a tree and scrapes her knee
Her dress has got a tear
She waltzes on her way to Mass
And whistles on the stair
And underneath her wimple
She has curlers in her hair
I even heard her singing in the abbey

She's always late for chapel
But her penitence is real
She's always late for everything
Except for every meal
I hate to have to say it
But I very firmly feel
Maria's not an asset to the abbey

I'd like to say a word in her behalf
Maria makes me laugh

How do you solve a problem like Maria?
How do you catch a cloud and pin it down?
How do you find a word that means Maria?
A flibbertijibbet! A will-o'-the wisp! A clown!

Many a thing you know you'd like to tell her
Many a thing she ought to understand
But how do you make her stay
And listen to all you say
How do you keep a wave upon the sand

Oh, how do you solve a problem like Maria?
How do you hold a moonbeam in your hand?

When I'm with her I'm confused
Out of focus and bemused
And I never know exactly where I am
Unpredictable as weather
She's as flighty as a feather
She's a darling! She's a demon! She's a lamb!

She'd outpester any pest
Drive a hornet from its nest
She could throw a whirling dervish out of whirl
She is gentle! She is wild!
She's a riddle! She's a child!
She's a headache! She's an angel!
She's a girl!

How do you solve a problem like Maria?
How do you catch a cloud and pin it down?
How do you find a word that means Maria?
A flibbertijibbet! A will-o'-the wisp! A clown!

Many a thing you know you'd like to tell her
Many a thing she ought to understand
But how do you make her stay
And listen to all you say
How do you keep a wave upon the sand

Oh, how do you solve a problem like Maria?
How do you hold a moonbeam in your hand?



just youtubed it. what is this, a musical or something?

seriously, teapots? a musical? :lol: why am i not surprised.
12/23/2011 4:06 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:I can't believe you fucks never got The Sound of Music reference. Congrats Sir Teapots.



never heard of it. what's the reference?
12/23/2011 3:51 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:Says the guy whose freedom of choice gave us George HW Bush's son as President just 8 years after his father, and who is likely to see Bill Clinton's wife as President by the end of this decade.

OF FUCKING COURSE there are aspects of North Korea's governance that put it far beyond the pale compared to the USA. But I find it sad to see how many Americans recoil and refuse to acknowledge even the handful of disturbing similarities, parallels and trends. The brainwashing is pretty damn thorough in both nations, it seems.



what are you talking about? america is a corrupt wasteland. i've said it a thousand times.

reminder: i also said illusion of political choice, which americans have in spades. you are terrible at this. this discussion started because you (or another dot) tried to paint kim il-sung as some kind of decent old man whose reputation has been destroyed by his degenerate successors. that's what i've been talking about this whole time. if you're incapable of following along, go start a thread about american politics and i'll be happy to join in.
12/23/2011 3:42 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:WTF are you talking about? I'm sure you realize that there are THREE major political parties in North Korea. Yes, they all end up supporting the same interests in the big picture of things... but the same can be said of the Democrats and Republicans in the USA.

If you believe that Americans have "the illusion of political choice" then you have to concede that Kim Il Sung gave the same to North Koreans as well.



there is no such thing as even the illusion of political choice when you cannot elect your head of state -- a head of state who wields absolute power and authority. north korea is not a "constitutional monarchy" like britain; it is a monarchy. a communist monarchy, for christ's sake. that's like a black guy leading the ku klux klan. it boggles my mind that you're even defending this sort of nonsense.
12/23/2011 3:31 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:The Korean people for the most part were genuine in their affection for Kim Il Sung. He was an authoritarian leader in a nation accustomed to Confucian authoritarianism. It was the kid, Jong Il, who transformed North Korea from prosperous nut cult (after the Korean War, NK was ahead of SK for several decades) into nut cult death camp.



it was under kim il-sung's rule that the north korean economy faltered. and he built most of those death camps, not his son.
12/23/2011 3:28 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:Until the 1960s, North Korea's economy grew much faster than South Korea's. Although P'yongyang was behind in total national output, it was ahead of Seoul in per capita national output, because of its smaller population relative to South Korea. For example, in 1960 North Korea's population was slightly over 10 million persons, while South Korea's population was almost 25 million persons. Phenomenal annual economic growth rates of 30 percent and 21 percent during the Three-Year Plan of 1954-56 and the Five-Year Plan of 1957-60, respectively, were reported. After claiming early fulfillment of the Five-Year Plan in 1959, North Korea officially designated 1960 a "buffer year"--a year of adjustment to restore balances among sectors before the next plan became effective in 1961. Not surprisingly the same phenomenon recurred in subsequent plans. Because the Five-Year Plan was fulfilled early, it became a de facto four-year plan. Beginning in the early 1960s, however, P'yongyang's economic growth slowed until it was stagnant at the beginning of the 1990s.



totally irrelevant, because kim il-sung ruled north korea during both the "swinging '50s" and the "stagnant early '90s" (his son took power in '94). so which is it?

and, again, there is no mention of his character or concern for his people in your pasted excerpt, which is what i took exception to in the first place. this is a man who created the world's only communist monarchy. he denied his own people even the illusion of political choice. instead, he built himself up as a god -- a literal, down-from-the-mountain-top god -- and formed a state religion around these ridiculous myths to further demoralize and control his own people.

a despicable cretin and nothing more.
12/23/2011 3:14 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:By all accounts, Kim Il Sung was sincerely devoted to the good of the North Korean people.



oh really? let's see some of these "accounts." we have obviously not been reading the same books.


12/23/2011 3:01 am

View Thread

View Post
mr the teapots said:A nice mantion, all the steaks, congac, pharmaceuticals, and traffic girls you want. In exchange you just have to give your consent to a civilian horror show. It would take a big man to say no to that scale of corruption.



yeah. and they won't kill you cleanly like the romanovs, either. straight to the labor camp with the rest of the unwanteds. fuuuuuck that.
12/23/2011 2:56 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:That's good. The generals will want to open up the country just to get modern goods.



the generals already have modern goods. you realize that they ride around in mercedes benz sedans, right? and that kim jong-il was notorious for spending tens of thousands of dollars at a time on cases of hennessy.
12/23/2011 2:53 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:The new dear leader is not happy, unlike his strong dad and grand dad he is under the thumb of the generals. Like Rome without the upside.



are you kidding? you think kim jong-il was a figure of strength? a porn-obsessed drunkard like him? he spent his entire life under the thumb of the military. his son is no different. that's why nothing will change in north korea. kim jong-un isn't his father's son; he's his reincarnation.
12/23/2011 2:49 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:China is working on them. Borders areas of NK are getting all kinds of commercial goods. Get rid of sanctions which help keep the dictators in place .



china is preparing to move against most of its neighbors to secure its territorial claims:

http://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/48951000/gif/_48951920_south_china-sea_1_466.gif

when it comes to north korea, the chinese aren't "working on" anything. to them, the entire korean peninsula is a throwaway; an altar sacrifice and nothing more. china treats the dprk like a rotten tree branch, useful only for poking uncle sam in the eye. but now that american power and influence are on the decline, china smells blood and is ready to assert its dominance in the region by force. they will never bend their little korean stick into an olive wreath. they'll tie a brick to the end of it and wield it like a war club. and if the stick snaps in half, oh well.

 

Page: Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 Next