I agree and with the missing time the place this all started. The 60 minutes interview wants to paint the picture of it happenening by the banner but who is to say it did. The video that is shown could have been any time during the time they were shooting footage prior to the event. The video does not need to be true for the story that they want to pass on to be conveyed and it leaves the viewer thinking one thing and not being able to find any thing because they are looking at what was given to them as a truth by CBS.
You need to look at who else is in the pictures and videos and what uniforms and identification that can be gathered from them. The main reason I think that the pictures and video have not come to light is because it will show members who can be identified as secret police taking part in the act. No pictures and no video is no proof and everyone will believe the thugs released from prison theory. With the release of the pictures many clearly could be identified as the very same people that told her a week before not to return. A government sactioned hit if you will.
There was more going on then a rape of a well known and highly regarded journalist. You focus to much on the event and not the cause and why? Think outside the box because thinking inside is just what they want you to do?
I believe that the pictures along with the truth is still out there and that sooner rather then later they will appear. CBS version is the dumbed down politically correct version with a shorter time limit and more a beating rather then a gang rape. The real version is much more violent with a longer period of time and more sexual nature to teach her a lesson about disobeying the secret police.
I have suspected a coverup from the beginning and think it was a joint effort between the two governments and in turn the news groups not so much to save Lara's dignity but to make the arab spring more a peaceful revolution but there is no peaceful revolutions except maybe Prince and the revolution but that would be it
I was pointing to your statement about post it here and it becomes fact and your sort of right because if you post it here it becomes a link on google depending on the keywords you use. Not trying to dog you or anything just saying your statement does hold water.
If you don't believe me do a search on google for Lara Logan attack and see how many of the responses show this board. Its weird how this board shows up more then anything else regarding the attack and we have no facts. So if a fact is proven evidence then how is this possible?
and your point being dude or gal both cases they would not risk their job trying to prove a point. No prove he or she is with any news group and if they were then they would be the one's with the answers and would beable to make statements that would prove Euro wrong. Just by claiming to be a member of a news group means they would have more inside info then Euro so why question Euros statements unless maybe he is on to something?
as for that phony news guy that posted a few pages back I am not so sure because if you were a news guy and had questions for one of us don't you think that maybe he is afraid of what is being said here? I don't think a real news guy would out himself even in a public domain to prove one way or the other who was lying and who was telling the truth.
Well I agree that no evidence has been presented which in the big picture means no facts on what happened and that we are all really guessing in the big picture until facts arrive then the truth can be found.
I Think Temoris saw nothing and when 60 minutes released their version he tried to backtrack so as not to look like a complete ass clown and still was able to hold his badge in douchebadgery but his double stories and lies prove he saw nothing and missed the story of the night while sipping tea.
No she did not give all the details and if this was just her and a few thugs that is different. This was not a few thugs out to harm a single lady. She was a journalist from a major network in the middle of a celebration for democracy. The facts should not be covered up to protect a past government or a new government. This is bigger then her and they should own up to it and explain the real facts and not hide behind a coverup. Yes she does have rights as a victim but Her rights also change when she is reporting on events that change the world.