Posts by Katalyst

Archivist said:

What are you lying about now? Just cooked dinner for my son, as I do every Th-Sun night.

Paint your toenails yet? Going out trolling for fags this evening?

Archivist said:

Passive/Aggressive. As always. You fail. As always.

Archivist said:

Just answer the question, without the passive/aggressive reply. if you can. I doubt it.

Archivist said:

Remember when you were tolerated by other posters outside of the other buttplugs?

Neither do I.

. said:

Our confederate horse soldier just can't stand up to the atom bomb.

Archivist said:

Are you wearing the "Mascara" dress tonight?

. said:

Do you ever PUBLICLY thank the taxpayers of California for your welfare checks?

. said:

...and Katalyst derails another thread

. said:

How is this "arguing against" anything? It is just a fact?

. said:

No Katalyst, I said no court will give you a default judgement absent proof of service. Then you went of on a tangent about Wikipedia.

. said:

No, you don't have to serve someone personally

This is what we've been saying since page one, and you argued against it.

. said:

Ugh, you really are ignorant.

Is it the concept of "proof of service" that you can't comprehend?

Do you think that you can just drop a summons off on a door step and thats it?

You don't think a court of law would require some "proof" that you did so?

Re-read the posts and think about it Katalyst, it's really not that complicated.

. said:

Wrong again Katalyst. I said a default judgement can not be entered without proof of service. This remains a fact. Sorry.

. said:

Nice Spanky self ownage too:

Entry of default
Typically, the plaintiff (or cross-complainant, cross-plaintiff, counter-claimant, counter-plaintiff, third-party plaintiff, etc.) must show that service of process was effected on the defendant (cross-defendant, counter-defendant, cross-defendant, third-party defendant, etc.). This is typically achieved by the filing of an affidavit of service (also known as a proof of service), which gives enough information to allow the court to confirm that valid service has been accomplished.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Default_judgment#Entry_of_default

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_of_process#Process_serving_laws_.28United_States.29


...If the individual refuses to accept service, flees, closes the door, etc., and the individual has been positively identified as the person to be served, documents may be "drop" served, and it is considered a valid service.



That's why it's called a "process" lardass.

. said:

More emoticons. That very clever.

Its funny that you are hung up on Wikipedia. Lots of people use it as a starting point for research, its just a tool, and yes, it can have useful information. Sorry.

. said:

Yes, but for case law they cite their sources and they direct you to external links.

You are not "relying" on it, you are using it as a place to start your research.

If you needed the holding for the Steel Seizure case and class was in five minutes, you would look at Wikipedia. Sorry.

"Excuse me your honour, may I request a 5 minute recess while I check something on Wikipedia?"
\

. said:

That's clever.

So seriously, what's wrong with Wiki?

. said:

What is wrong with Wikipedia? In law school if we wanted a to brief a case lots of times we used wiki.

. said:

Why do you hate wikipedia?

Imagine hiring a lawyer and he says to you "So I've been doing some research on Wikipedia..."

. said:

@ the trannie putting mittens under it's own post. Probably forgot the password for the "mascara" troll.

. said:

. said:

Sorry wikilawyer fatboi, you can, and you're going to learn the hard way just how little you know about the law.

I'm not Spanky, but I am a lawyer. Sorry.

Here this might help:

Entry of default
Typically, the plaintiff (or cross-complainant, cross-plaintiff, counter-claimant, counter-plaintiff, third-party plaintiff, etc.)[1] must show that service of process was effected on the defendant (cross-defendant, counter-defendant, cross-defendant, third-party defendant, etc.). This is typically achieved by the filing of an affidavit of service[2] (also known as a proof of service),[3] which gives enough information to allow the court to confirm that valid service has been accomplished.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Default_judgment#Entry_of_default

. said:

Amex isn't going to get shit. You are dreaming.

. said:

Wrong dot, retard.

Clear enough for you?

. said:

Katalyst said:

That's not what I said, "retard". I said you cannot simply hide and try to wait out a deadline, then get a judgement in your favour.

Wrong retard.

. said:

Wrong retard.