F2 Navigation   |  Options  |  Login  |  Register  |  Status  |  FAQ  |  Upload Pics  |  Work-Safe Bookmark and Share


Posts by AustralianCarFancier

Page: Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 Next

 Timestamp Post 
9/14/2009 8:40 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:And they should fly in african airlines in planes piloted by africans and maintained by african mechanics.



Too expensive and slow. Just shove them into countries run by africans (like Liberia).
9/13/2009 12:25 pm

View Thread

View Post
. said:Thats because they are idiots.

Your so called "obamacare" would be crippled by fat fucks like this and their recurring, self induced health problems.



I'm a well known right winger on these boards but I come from a country with socialised health care, and I have to tell you that the few weeks I was not covered (too lazy to fill out a fucking form to have it renewed for free) I finally realised how valuable it is.

That said though, your country will never be able to afford such a thing, especially while you have an open border to the south. Even if the Republicans didnt oppose it, it would never go through as "universal" as it is made out to be.
9/7/2009 11:26 am

View Thread

View Post


http://www.zweg.com/dump/thumb/KathyBates.jpg
9/5/2009 11:44 am

View Thread

View Post
Plucky Retardo said: and the people in Aghanistan certainly have figured out how to recharge them .



Link?
9/5/2009 4:54 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:They are just really rich merchant class peasants, not even in the same class with royalty.
Even the Rockefeller family before 1850 were poor screwballs living in poverty in Ohio.



Where do you think European royalty comes from if you go back far enough? SUre, they always claim some link to Roman nobility but really they were just the generals and merchants fo their day who got very successful and struck when the time was right.
9/5/2009 4:46 am

View Thread

View Post
. said: :lol:

Are you serious? First off, you're Australian, right? What the fuck do you know about American tort law? Civil and criminal law are two seperate and distinct entitites. They have NO baring on one another. Their laws are completely different, their vocabulary is completely different. Just because you don't get charged for a criminal act does not mean you are exempt from being hit with a civil claim for the very same act. See OJ Simpson v. Gold. But go ahead, arm-chair lawyers, tell me I'm wrong. I mean, I only have a law degree. You guys probably watch "Law and Order". Me = :mittens:



"I'm a high-test, alpha type. Ex military, train MMA, etc."
\
:joshua:
9/5/2009 4:37 am

View Thread

View Post
. said: I'm a high-test, alpha type. Ex military, train MMA, etc. I would let a 13 year old african spit in my face and watch a 16 year old white girl get gang raped by a bunch of mexicans before I lifted a finger (unless the state had gooddollars defending yourself no matter what the circumstances sammy laws). Why? Because you WILL spend thousands of .



The quality of trolls has gone downhill lately.
9/5/2009 4:29 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:it was stil a bad idea. Jesus; we CREATED Osama bin Laden and the afghani fundamentalist movement. WHY THE HELL IS OUR NEWS MEDIA SILENT ON THIS ISSUE?



Wrong.
9/5/2009 2:38 am

View Thread

View Post
Nobody has emntioned that the family requested that AP not publish the photos. AP said "fuck you, this is bank"
9/5/2009 12:51 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:One good thing about WWII was it led to the end of the British Empire. Listen England, I dont like a monarchy. I do not care about your Queen Mum or what Harry is doing. Who the fuck is Fergie? Your no longer a world power. Reinvent yourself into something worthy to export, instead of your royalty and crappy Beckman.



Did you watch the Teddy Kennedy funeral on television?

Which member of the dynasty should replace him in position?
9/5/2009 12:46 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:What is the myth about Gallipoli?



That we had made this huge sacrifice fighting practically alone and abandoned by our colonial masters. Fact is, the French and the Brits lost more men there than we did, and we lost far more later in Western Europe which nobody ever really gave a shit about except for the French.
9/5/2009 12:44 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:No shit; Nagasaki had cloud cover and the fucktards missed their aim point by a mile and a half



Last minute break in the clouds, parachute retarded bomb was blown off course. :rolleyes:

Still no war crime.
9/5/2009 12:07 am

View Thread

View Post
Kingmambo_Redux said:America could have got the same result by hitting the largest remaining military arsenal. They chose to hit two highly densely populated cities instead.

They never tried to hit the Japanese military base because it wasnt about that. It was a science experiment, for which they needed suitable sites, two different test groups, and large amounts of test subjects.



What a load of shit that Japanese had all of their military assetts in one central location. Fact is, Kokura had cloud cover. The commander was ordered to proceed to a secondary target if the first was obscured by cloud.

Every country has their national myth, (mine is Gallipoli)but don;t get suckered by who surrounds you.
9/5/2009 12:00 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:Completely false. Do any of you idiots know what was going on between Hitler and his generals at the time? I didn't think so.



So the French (some British) did not fight a furious rarguard acction? The krauts were just letting them on thier way as long as they were marching in the right direction? The Totenkopf didn't execute Brits who fought too hard before surrendering?
9/4/2009 11:52 pm

View Thread

View Post
. said:Jews also vested their interests in the Kaiser in the First World War - he was the Messiah like Bush was the Messiah and was going to lead them to the promised land.

Then came the Balfour Declaration, and the 'stab in the back'. The rest is history.




"egged on and misled by the tribe of Judah ... Let no German ever forget this, nor rest until these parasites have been destroyed and exterminated from German soil!" He advocated a "regular international all-worlds pogrom a la Russe" as "the best cure" and further believed that Jews were a "nuisance that humanity must get rid of some way or other. I believe the best would be gas!"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaiser_Wilhelm_II#Life_in_exile
9/4/2009 11:47 pm

View Thread

View Post
. said:The Dutch had the largest percentage of Jews rounded up and shipped out of all the Western countries.



And they lost mroe men fighting for Germany than against them.
9/4/2009 12:24 pm

View Thread

View Post
Zathrus-1 said:Then when they turned to evacuate with the British, they found the British guns pointed at them. And the guns weren't lowered until most of the British were evacuated.

The Belgiums lost the rest of their army defending the British.



This would be a great point if it weren't a pile of shit. The Brits took just under 200K of their troops from Dunkirk. 140K French troops. And the Belgians had already surrendered.
9/4/2009 12:21 pm

View Thread

View Post
. said:After the US was attacked in a supirse 9/11 style attack and the US Pacific Fleet was nearly wiped out at Pearl Harbor, scientist (Einstein the main one) suggested to FDR that super weapon (the A-Bomb) could be built.

The had 200,000 scientist working on the A-bomb, it was not something that would have naturally been invented, it was one of the biggest projects in human history.

When the A-bomb was dropped on Japan they were already a defeated nation just holding on, their navy, air force and cities had already been fire bombed into the ground, many many more civilian deaths occurred due to the fire bombing of nearly EVERY major city in Japan.

Before the A-bomb was dropped Japan was basically in ruins.

The US built the bomb and wanted to us it on Japan to show the world what we were capable of as a society.

Japan would have surrendered had we let them keep the Emperor, who they considered to be their God, as head of state.

There was no real reason to nuke Japan, the war in Europe was over, all major cities in Japan were fire bombed into near total destruction, including Tokyo.

We didn't need to invade Japan, they were defeated already.

Using nuclear weapons on Japan was with out a doubt the biggest War Crime of the entire war.



This post is complete crap.

Nukes would have been invented elsewhere eventually, so many resources were poured into the Manhatten project because every day counted.

Obviously every Japanese city wasnt completely destroyed, or there wouldnt be anything left to nuke?

The Emporer did not have complete power, the military threatened and curbed his power on many occasions. It took him a while to gather enough support for a surrender and even then he feared that hardliners would kidnap him and issue decrees on his behalf (the public had not heard his voice, ever)
9/4/2009 12:16 pm

View Thread

View Post
Kingmambo_Redux said:This is the prototypical case of the victor writing the history. America didnt accept a Japanese surrender until after they had dropped their second bomb.

Again, American intelligence was well aware that the lions share of the remaining Japanese military was stationed at Kokura, but chose to bomb Hiroshima instead precisely because it WASNT a military target. It provided far better data as to the damage done to city infrastructure as well as the effects of a population to radiation exposure.

The second bomb went after a population center rather than a military target as well, for the same reason. Only after they had used up their payload and it wouldve taken months to build more did they accept japanese surrender.

The US military would later say that they chose Hiroshima because it was too cloudy at Kokura that day, which may be the flimsiest excuse that Americans have ever been told to swallow about anything ever.



Uhuh. Because there sure isn't a vicitm mentality in Japan today regardng this. :rolleyes:

They did not "try" to surrender, that would be were you say "we give up. Come and disarm us." Unauthorised (by the military leadership) feelers were being put out with bullshit conditions while the whole country was preparing to commit a long horrible suicide.
Every single day that the war continued meant more people dying, with millions more to die if the ground invasions had to continue. Did you know that part of the Olympic plans were to use gas on Japanese cities?

Did you know that the Allied planners estimated five million civilian casualties as a result of the gas alone?
9/4/2009 11:57 am

View Thread

View Post
Teapots said:He "let them go" at Dunkirk because the French put up a furious rearguard to protect their allies and suffered extreme casualties in doing so.



Very true
9/3/2009 11:56 am

View Thread

View Post
. said: :lol:

You watch too much tv. Again, Israel had fewer losses.

As far as your belief that IDF soldiers shoot indiscriminately, compare the casualties in the US / Iraq war, or US / Afghan war.

In fact the Afghanistan is a good comparisson because you can compare the brit losses / kills to the yank losses / kills. Brits do no carpet bomb or shoot blind as much as the Americans, so the civilian casualties as a result of brit fire are lower. Similar to the IDF, less carpet bombing, more accurate targetting.

Put your stars and stripes down for a second and focus on facts.




If only war was a football match, then bodycounts would matter.
9/1/2009 8:20 am

View Thread

View Post
http://gamesnet.vo.llnwd.net/o1/gamestar/objects/161646_main.jpg
8/30/2009 3:23 am

View Thread

View Post
bensa said:Nowdays, you need to be KIA to be buried at Arlington. I have a set of grandparents buried there. My grandfather was KIA in Italy during WW2.

Very difficult to be buried there and is a tremendous honor.

Ted Kennedy anad Jackie-O should never have been buried there. Never ever. Angers me.

Congress was supposed to pass a law to prevent any political pressure from "favors" being done to grant special burials. The law never happened.

Anyway, feel free to ask me questions about Arlington. Know alot about it.



But they did pass laws when Timothy McVeigh got the death sentence to prevent him being buried there.
8/30/2009 3:17 am

View Thread

View Post
. said:As someone who has actually served, I can say that it sounds to me that Bensa is legit. He knows more than an average wannabe would be able to dig up on Google or pick up in movies (i.e., milspeak terms, culture, etc.).



Maybe he was in a relationship with somebody who did serve?

ie "serving in silence"...
8/24/2009 8:51 am

View Thread

View Post
I have a rather unusual question.

If an apocalyptic event happened that caused a massive depopulation, but somehow most of the students had survived and gathered at the school with yourself being the only staff member to survive, would you abandon them to their fate or become their shepherd?

Would you try to start some kind of society with basic enough to understand instructions like Earth Abides or would you just get them to take care of you?
 

Page: Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 Next